PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Arabian Journal of Chemistry1 citationsOpen Access

Thermogravimetric analysis and pyrolysis kinetics of typical crop straws

HFHui FangRXRui-Shen XieLWLi-Xia Wu

Key Points

  • The study aims to analyze the pyrolysis kinetics of corn, rapeseed, and cotton straws using thermogravimetric methods.
  • Conducted thermogravimetric analysis at heating rates of 10, 20, 30, and 40°C/min.
  • Utilized three model-free methods—FWO, KAS, Starink—to assess activation energies.
  • Employed the Coats-Redfern method combined with 17 mechanistic models to determine optimal reaction mechanisms.
  • Identified three stages in the pyrolytic weight loss process: drying, pyrolysis, and carbonization.
  • Calculated apparent activation energies for corn, rapeseed, and cotton straws using different methods, showing variability among straw types.
  • Found that thermodynamic properties were significantly higher for rapeseed straw, indicating its more complex reaction.

Abstract

Using corn stalks, rapeseed stalks, and cotton stalks as raw materials, the pyrolysis characteristics and kinetic parameters in a nitrogen atmosphere were analyzed from a kinetic perspective through thermogravimetric (TG) and differential thermogravimetric (DTG) curves at four different heating rates of 10, 20, 30, and 40°C/min. Three model-free methods—Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO), Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose (KAS), and Starink —were employed to calculate the apparent activation energy and pre-exponential factor. Combining the Coats-Redfern (CR) model method with 17 mechanistic models, the optimal reaction mechanism model was ultimately obtained. Research findings indicate that the pyrolytic weight loss process of straw can be divided into three stages: drying and dehydration, pyrolysis of organic compounds such as cellulose/hemicellulose/lignin, and carbonization. The apparent activation energies calculated for corn straw using the FWO method, KAS method, and Starink method were 85.16 kJ mol -1 , 75 kJ mol -1 , and 75.41 kJ mol -1 , respectively; for rapeseed straw: 99.7 kJ mol -1 , 89.71 kJ mol -1 , and 90 kJ mol -1 ; for cotton straw: 90.17 kJ mol -1 , 79.62 kJ mol -1 , and 80.04 kJ mol -1 . The CR method revealed that the mechanism equations for pyrolysis of all three straw types conform to the F3 model. Additionally, under N₂ atmosphere, the thermodynamic properties of the reaction—specifically ΔH, ΔG, and ΔS—were significantly higher for rapeseed straw than for corn and cotton straw, confirming the greater complexity of its reaction. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of straw pyrolysis mechanisms and provide a theoretical foundation for the resource utilization of solid waste.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a287f20a974eb0d3c03d9fhttps://doi.org/10.25259/ajc_1267_2025
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparative study of pyrolysis behaviors of corn stalk and its three components2013 · 81 citations
  2. 2Chemical characterization and oxidative potential of particles emitted from open burning of cereal straws and rice husk under flaming and smoldering conditions2017 · 80 citations
  3. 3Kinetic study of regional agro-industrial wastes pyrolysis using non-isothermal TGA analysis2016 · 101 citations
  4. 4Biomass pyrolysis: past, present, and future2018 · 524 citations
  5. 5Synergistic Effects and Kinetics in Co-Pyrolysis of Waste Tire With Five Agricultural Residues Using Thermogravimetric Analysis2023 · 12 citations