PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Atmospheric chemistry and physics0 citationsOpen Access

Occurrence of seeding multi-layer clouds in the Arctic from ground-based observations

PAPeggy AchtertTSTorsten SeeligGWGabriella Wallentin

Key Points

  • The research aims to investigate the occurrence of multi-layer clouds and the ice-crystal seeding process in the Arctic.
  • Analyzed data from soundings and cloud radar during the MOSAiC, ACSE, and AO2018 research cruises.
  • Conducted long-term observations at Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard, and Utqiagvik, Alaska.
  • Assessed the rates of single-layer clouds and multi-layer clouds, focusing on cold conditions.
  • Cold multi-layer clouds were more abundant from November to June, appearing in 40% to 55% of cases.
  • Seeding occurred in about 50% to 66% of identified cold multi-layer clouds.
  • The seeding rate significantly increased with larger ice crystal sizes, by up to 20 percentage points.

Abstract

Abstract. Studies of Arctic clouds often focus on low-level single-layer clouds (SLCs). Here, we use combined observations of soundings and cloud radar during the MOSAiC, ACSE, and AO2018 research cruises as well as from long-term observations at Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard and Utqiagvik, Alaska to investigate the occurrence of SLCs and multi-layer clouds (MLCs) in the Arctic and to assess the rate of ice-crystal seeding in cold MLCs. MOSAiC observations show cloudy conditions in between 70 % and 90 % of sounding-radar cases. SLCs show occurrence rates of 30 % to 40 % with the highest value of 45 % during October. Cold MLCs are most abundant from November to June (40 % to 55 % of cases). Seeding occurs in about half to two thirds of the identified cold MLCs during MOSAiC for which the sub-saturated layer extends between 100 and 1000 m. The seeding rate increases by as much as 20 percentage points as the assumed size of the falling ice crystals is increased from 100 to 400 µm. The observations reveal a stable rate of cloud-free conditions of around 20 % over the covered latitude range. Cloud occurrence during MOSAiC and at Ny-Ålesund in July, when the geographical distance between observations was minimal, shows reasonable agreement. Comparisons of MOSAiC and other research cruises to the central Arctic also indicate consistent occurrence rates of different cloud types despite the likely effect of year-to-year variability. The comparison of data from ship campaigns and land sites suggests that the latter are not necessarily a good indicator of cloud occurrence in the high Arctic.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Achtert et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a288060a974eb0d3c03ebdhttps://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-3049-2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper