PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Administrative Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Development and Validation of a Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Factors Related to Organizational Changes and Occupational Stress

View Full Paper
BABeatriz Acosta-UribeAMAriadna Crisantema Martínez-HernándezEBEmilio Sánchez Santa Bárbara

Key Points

  • This study aimed to create and validate a questionnaire assessing psychosocial factors linked to organizational changes and occupational stress.
  • Utilized an instrumental study design for questionnaire construction and validation.
  • Sample comprised 350 workers with diverse occupational backgrounds.
  • Refined an initial 48-item questionnaire to a final version of 24 items across 7 scales.
  • Conducted factor analysis to evaluate the internal structure and validity of the instrument.
  • Established a seven-factor structure explaining 72% of total variance in the data.
  • Demonstrated internal consistency across scales with alpha scores ranging from 0.72 to 0.91.
  • Low to moderate inter-scale correlations supported the validity of distinct constructs.

Abstract

In recent decades, profound transformations in work organization, employment conditions, and organizational change processes have intensified workers’ exposure to psychosocial risks, with significant consequences for occupational health and well-being. Despite the growing relevance of these risks, organizations often lack psychometrically robust instruments capable of capturing psychosocial stressors associated with change, Conflicts, and working conditions in an integrated manner. The purpose of this study was to develop and psychometrically evaluate a questionnaire designed to measure psychosocial factors related to organizational changes, interpersonal Conflicts, and occupational well-being. An instrumental study design was employed, following international standards for the construction and validation of psychological instruments. The sample consisted of 350 workers with a mean age of 33.19 years (SD = 9.18; range: 18–66) and an average organizational tenure of 6.71 years (SD = 8.61). The initial 48-item questionnaire was refined to a final version comprising 24 items distributed across 7 scales: Organizational Changes, Work Program, Job Security, Promotion, Training, Interpersonal Conflicts, and Lack of Participation. Preliminary analyses indicated that the data adequately met the assumptions for factor analysis (KMO = 0.81; Bartlett’s test χ2 = 4376.98, p < 0.001). The results supported a seven-factor structure explaining 72% of the total variance, with clear and interpretable factor loadings consistent with the theoretical model. Internal consistency was acceptable to excellent across scales (α = 0.72–0.91; ω = 0.84–0.95), including short scales with three items. Inter-scale correlations were low to moderate, supporting discriminant validity and indicating that the dimensions, while related, represent distinct constructs. Overall, the findings provide strong evidence for the instrument’s reliability and validity based on its internal structure, supporting its use for psychosocial risk assessment and research on organizational changes, interpersonal Conflicts, and occupational well-being.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Acosta-Uribe et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a288170a974eb0d3c04053https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16030111
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper