PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Journal of Education and Health Promotion1 citationsOpen Access

Resolving the organ transplantation challenges by 3D bioprinting: A scoping review on case studies

View Full Paper
PSParimal ShindeSJSangita JogdandSBSmruti Besekar

Key Points

  • This review aims to explore the benefits and challenges of using 3D bioprinting in organ transplantation based on specific case studies.
  • Reviewed five case studies on 3D organ bioprinting applications.
  • Applied the PRISMA-S approach for systematic review.
  • Investigated techniques used in clinical settings including public bone rebuilding, spinal defect repair, and liver transplantation.
  • 3D bioprinting reduced operative time by 30%.
  • Enhanced anatomical visualization and surgical accuracy were reported.
  • Preoperative planning was improved, though issues like cost and regulatory concerns were also highlighted.

Abstract

In response to the organ shortage and enhance surgical precision, 3D bioprinting has now become an innovative approach and technology that furnish practical challenges in the conventional medicine. Given the importance, the review is performed to understand clinical benefits and usage of this technology by using case studies on the 3D organ bioprinting implemented on the human live patients that implies about the various techniques of 3D organ printing. The study follows the standardized preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis structured (PRISMA-S) approach for the extraction of the relevant study from the databases by using the specific keywords such as “3D bioprint” and “Case study.” Only five pertinent case studies are selected which include pubic bone rebuilding, spinal defect repair, and liver transplantation in complex anatomical circumstances. It is noted from the studies that using 3D bioprint in complex cases reduced operative time by 30% and it enhanced anatomical visualization, surgical accuracy, and preoperative planning, but also emphasizes issues like expense, adaptability, and regulatory concerns, highlighting the necessity for further study and clinical use.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shinde et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a288170a974eb0d3c04080https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_511_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1(3D) Bioprinting—Next Dimension of the Pharmaceutical Sector2024 · 15 citations
  2. 2A rare anatomical variation complicating a diffuse abdominal pain presentation2021 · 4 citations
  3. 3Light-based 3D bioprinting of bone tissue scaffolds with tunable mechanical properties and architecture from photocurable silk fibroin2022 · 125 citations
  4. 4Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: an overview2018 · 1,429 citations
  5. 5Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding organ donation among adult population of urban Puducherry, South India2018 · 59 citations