PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2026Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery0 citationsOpen Access

EXPRESS: A long-term field safety study evaluating allogeneic uterine-derived mesenchymal stem cells for refractory feline chronic gingivostomatitis (FCGS)

View Full Paper
VWValentine WilliamsJSJürgen E. SchneiderRPRudolph S. Parrish

Key Points

  • The study aimed to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of allogeneic uterine-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UMSCs) in treating refractory feline chronic gingivostomatitis (FCGS).
  • Prospective, multi-site, open-label extension study of client-owned cats with refractory FCGS
  • Cats received two intravenous doses of 20 million UMSCs, 14 days apart during initial trial
  • Follow-up assessed safety through physical exams, owner observations, and lab analyses
  • Clinical outcomes were evaluated via owner-reported assessments and veterinarian ratings
  • No serious adverse events reported with UMSC administration
  • 69% of cats showed weight gain, averaging a 16.2% increase
  • Improvements in owner-reported assessments of overall response (75.8% at Day 180, 65.6% at Day 365)
  • Mean reduction in global oral lesion score was 33% at one year
  • 66% of cats did not resume medical therapy after UMSC treatment

Abstract

ObjectivesThe study primarily evaluated the long-term safety of intravenous, allogeneic uterine-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (UMSCs) for client-owned cats affected with refractory feline chronic gingivostomatitis (FCGS). Effectiveness was also evaluated during this extension phase, with other medications permitted.MethodsThis prospective, multi-site, open-label extension study evaluated cats with refractory FCGS after partial- or full-mouth extractions and persistent clinical signs despite medical management. During the initial trial, cats received two intravenous doses of 20 million UMSCs, 14 days apart. No additional UMSC dosing occurred during the present follow-up period. Thirty-five cats were enrolled through Day 365. Safety assessments included physical examination, owner-reported observations, and clinicopathology. Clinical outcomes were evaluated descriptively using owner-reported assessment of overall response (ORA) and veterinarian-assessed global oral lesion score (GOLS). Concomitant medications were permitted.ResultsNo serious AEs were associated with UMSC administration, and no clinically relevant abnormalities were observed via hematology or urinalysis. The most common AEs temporally associated with dosing were transient nausea, vomiting, tachypnea, diarrhea, hypersalivation, and pyrexia. At one year, sixty-nine percent (69%) of cats gained weight (mean increase of 16.2%). Improvement in ORA at Days 180 and 365 was 75.8% and 65.6%, respectively. Improvement in GOLS at Days 180 and 365 was 51.5% and 46.9%, respectively. Mean reduction in lesion score at one year was 33%, with 22% of cats achieving clinical cure. Sixty-six percent (66%) of cats did not restart medical therapy after UMSC treatment, with only 8.6% continuing an immunosuppressant drug.ConclusionsRepeated intravenous UMSC therapy in cats with refractory FCGS appears safe long-term, with no reported immunogenic or tumorigenic safety concerns. Clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life were maintained out to one year with concurrent medication use as needed; most cats were able to discontinue immunosuppressant medications. These results support the safe use of UMSCs for refractory FCGS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Williams et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a3d811ec16d51705d2ea1bhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1098612x261431058
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper