PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2026The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics0 citationsOpen Access

A study on the efficiency and influencing factors of China’s four-stage ports using DEA and Tobit two-stage models

View Full Paper
XZXinyuan ZhuASAe Rim SoSSSeungsik Shin

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze the efficiency of China's four-stage ports and identify influencing factors.
  • Utilized time series data from 16 major coastal ports in China from 2010 to 2019.
  • Applied Data Envelope Analysis (DEA)-Window and Tobit models for efficiency analysis.
  • Identified correlations between port efficiency and various economic and demographic factors.
  • Most coastal ports maintained high efficiency scores in recent years.
  • Inefficient resource use and over-expansion were common issues found.
  • Central region ports showed lower efficiency compared to northern and southern ports.
  • Local population size, industrial productivity, and economic level positively correlated with efficiency.
  • A negative relationship was observed between port efficiency and financial institution loans.

Abstract

Chinese ports reached their fourth stage of development in 2013. Based on this context, this study analyzes the efficiency of four-stage ports using time series data on 16 major coastal ports in China from 2010 to 2019, covering the latter half of stage three into stage four. Using Data Envelope Analysis (DEA)-Window and Tobit models, the results indicate that although most ports maintained high efficiency, issues such as inefficient resource use, over-expansion, and a lack of strategic planning were identified. Particularly, based on the average efficiency scores, ports in the central region exhibited relatively lower efficiency levels compared to those on the north and south coasts. Factors such as local population size, industrial productivity, and economic level positively influenced efficiency. In addition, our results showed a negative correlation between port efficiency and loans from financial institutions, suggesting financial support may not always positively contribute to port development. Based on these findings, we propose policy recommendations for the Chinese government, port management authorities, operators, and the international port industry.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a3d824ec16d51705d2eb36https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2026.02.001
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables1958 · 7,035 citations
  2. 2Factors Influencing Chinese Coastal Shippers" Carrier Selection Amid the U.S.-China Trade Conflict and the COVID-19 Pandemic2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Lending for growth? A Granger causality analysis of China’s finance–growth nexus2016 · 29 citations
  4. 4INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION AS A LEADING INDICATOR FOR CONTAINER PORT THROUGHPUT IN TURKEY2019 · 4 citations
  5. 5A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors2007 · 10,962 citations