PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Linguistic Analysis of Literary Texts Using Artificial Intelligence Across Language Systems

View Full Paper
ALAisuluu Lema

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore the effectiveness of artificial intelligence in analyzing literary texts across varied language systems.
  • Investigated linguistic analysis levels: lexical, morphological, syntactic, and semantic.
  • Compared AI-generated analyses across analytical, inflectional, and agglutinative languages.
  • Examined AI performance in processing cultural meanings unique to literary discourse.
  • AI analysis reveals systematic discrepancies in accuracy among different language systems.
  • AI efficiently processes surface-level linguistic features but struggles with morphological complexity.
  • Cultural semantics pose limitations that lessen the interpretative depth of AI-generated analyses.

Abstract

The rapid development of artificial intelligence has significantly influenced contemporary linguistic research, particularly in the field of automated text analysis. While AI-based tools are increasingly applied to literary texts, their effectiveness across different language systems remains insufficiently explored. This article investigates the potential and limitations of artificial intelligence in conducting linguistic analysis of literary texts belonging to distinct language systems, including analytical, inflectional, and agglutinative languages. The study focuses on lexical, morphological, syntactic, and semantic levels of analysis, with special attention to culturally embedded meanings characteristic of literary discourse. By comparing AI-generated analyses across languages with differing grammatical structures, the research reveals systematic discrepancies in accuracy and interpretative depth. The findings demonstrate that although artificial intelligence can efficiently process surface-level linguistic features, its performance is uneven across language systems and remains limited in addressing morphological complexity and cultural semantics. The study argues that AI should be regarded as a supplementary analytical tool rather than a substitute for traditional philological analysis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aisuluu Lema (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a3d824ec16d51705d2ec85https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18803237
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper