PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Subjective Evaluation of Denture Adhesives in Mandibular Complete Denture Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

View Full Paper
AMAfsheen MaqsoodHospital Universiti Sains MalaysiaWSWan Nazatul Shima ShahidanUniversiti Sains MalaysiaMAMaria Shakoor AbbasiShaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology

Key Points

  • The study aimed to compare the short-term effects of different denture adhesives on satisfaction and functional outcomes among mandibular complete denture wearers.
  • 240 completely edentulous participants aged 40–70 were randomized into four groups: cream, strip, powder adhesives, and control.
  • Subjective outcomes measured included satisfaction, chewing ability, speaking ability, cleanliness, retention, and comfort after one week.
  • Data analyzed using χ2 tests and Bonferroni correction, with p ≤ 0.05 considered significant.
  • All adhesive types enhanced satisfaction, chewing ability, retention, and comfort compared to the control group (p < 0.001).
  • Cream and strip adhesives significantly improved speaking ability (p < 0.001); powder adhesive showed no significant improvement (p > 0.05).
  • Participant satisfaction ranged from 26.7% with powder to 50% with strips; effective chewing from 33.3% with powder to 63.3% with strips.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Edentulism significantly affects oral function and quality of life, particularly among mandibular complete denture wearers, where reduced retention and stability remain common clinical challenges. Denture adhesives are frequently recommended as adjuncts to improve denture performance; however, limited randomized controlled trials have compared different adhesive forms using standardized control conditions. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the short‐term subjective effects of cream, powder, and strip‐type denture adhesives on satisfaction and functional outcomes in mandibular complete denture wearers. Methods This randomized controlled trial included 240 completely edentulous participants aged 40–70 years with moderately resorbed mandibular ridges. Participants were randomly allocated into four groups (n = 60 each): cream‐type adhesive, strip‐type adhesive, powder‐type adhesive, and a control group using 0.9% saline solution without adhesive. Subjective outcomes, including general satisfaction, chewing ability, speaking ability, denture cleanliness, retention, and comfort were assessed after 1 week using a five‐point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using χ2 tests with Bonferroni correction, and a p value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results All adhesive types demonstrated significantly higher satisfaction, improved chewing ability, greater retention, and enhanced comfort compared with the control group (p 0.05). The proportion of participants reporting high satisfaction ranged from 26.7% with powder to 50% with strips, effective chewing from 33.3% with powder to 63.3% with strips, and improved speaking ability from 23.3% with powder to 60% with strips. No significant differences in denture cleanliness were observed between the control and adhesive groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion All adhesive types significantly improve short‐term satisfaction, mastication, retention, and comfort in mandibular complete denture wearers. Improvements in speaking ability were observed with cream and strip adhesives only, while denture cleanliness or adhesive removal from dentures remained comparable across all groups. Trial Registration The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (first submitted date: June 24, 2021; identifier number: NCT05063422) and approved by the ethical review committee of Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Pakistan (AIDM/RDRC/01/2021/03).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maqsood et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a3d830ec16d51705d2ecfbhttps://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.71897
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper