PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2026Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease0 citationsOpen Access

The Prognostic Value of Left Atrial Size and Strain Assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in the Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion

View Full Paper
JTJinfan TianWXWenxiao XiaXYXueyao Yang

Key Result

In CTO patients with LVEF ≥ 40%, higher LA maximum volume index (LAVImax) was independently associated with increased risk of MACCE (HR up to 5.55).

Key Points

  • To assess the relationship between left atrial size and strain with clinical outcomes in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion.
  • Retrospective analysis of 168 patients with LVEF ≥ 40%
  • Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)
  • Adjusted models developed using Cox regression for LA size and strain parameters
  • 39 patients (23.2%) experienced MACCE over a mean follow-up of 45.9 months.
  • LAVImax was independently associated with MACCE (HR 1.05, p=0.004).
  • Higher quartiles of LAVImax increased the risk of MACCE significantly (Q2 HR 4.50, Q3 HR 4.40, Q4 HR 5.55).
  • LA strain parameters were not associated with MACCE.

Structured PICO

Does higher left atrial maximum volume index (LAVImax) or LA strain assessed by CMR predict major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion and LVEF ≥ 40%?

P
Population
168 patients with coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 40%
I
Intervention
Assessment of left atrial maximum volume index (LAVImax) and LA strain by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)
C
Comparator
Lower quartiles of LAVImax (e.g., first quartile)
O
Outcome
Composite of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)composite

In patients with coronary chronic total occlusion and preserved or mildly reduced LVEF, left atrial maximum volume index assessed by CMR is an independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, while LA strain is not.

Abstract

Background: The relationship between left atrial (LA) size, LA strain, and long-term prognosis in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association of LA size and LA strain with clinical outcomes in CTO patients using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Methods: This retrospective study included 168 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 40%. The primary endpoint was the composite of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Model 1 was established by adjusting for clinically relevant parameters and standard CMR metrics. Models 2–4 were developed using Cox regression based on Model 1, with additional adjustment for each LA strain parameter separately. Results: A total of 168 patients with an LVEF ≥ 40% were analyzed, of whom 39 (23.2%) experienced MACCE during a mean follow-up of 45.9 months (median, 42 months). A preliminary model suggested that LA maximum volume index (LAVImax) was independently associated with MACCE (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02–1.08, p = 0.004). Specifically, compared to the first quartile of LAVImax, the second, third, and fourth quartiles were associated with an increased risk of MACCE (Q2: HR 4.50, 95% CI 1.42–14.27, p = 0.011; Q3: HR 4.40, 95% CI 1.29–14.96, p = 0.018; Q4: HR 5.55, 95% CI 1.71–18.06, p = 0.004). In Models 2–4, higher LAVImax remained independently associated with MACCE (all p < 0.05), after adjusting for LA reservoir strain, conduit strain and booster strain, separately. In contrast, none of the LA strain parameters were associated with MACCE. Conclusions: Among CTO patients with LVEF ≥ 40%, LAVImax was independently associated with MACCE.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tian et al. (2026) studied this question. In CTO patients with LVEF ≥ 40%, higher LA maximum volume index (LAVImax) was independently associated with increased risk of MACCE (HR up to 5.55).

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a3d867ec16d51705d2f285https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd13030111
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper