PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2026Systems0 citationsOpen Access

Integrating Sustainable Development Goals into a Practically Applicable Sustainable Value Stream Mapping

View Full Paper
DSDorota StadnickaFLFrancesco LupiMMMohammed M. Mabkhot

Key Points

  • To integrate Sustainable Development Goals into Sustainable Value Stream Mapping for practical applications in manufacturing, particularly for SMEs.
  • Conducted a systematic literature review to identify sustainability indicators.
  • Used a Delphi-based expert assessment to map indicators to SDG Targets.
  • Verified findings through industrial assessment across 30 companies in different sectors.
  • Identified 18 economic, 22 environmental, and 18 social indicators aligned with 16 SDG Targets.
  • Findings show economic indicators align with SDG 8, environmental indicators with SDGs 9, 12, and 13, and social indicators with SDGs 3 and 8.
  • Identified persistent gaps in water, energy transition, and some climate-related Targets.

Abstract

As manufacturing organisations work to align their operations with global sustainability expectations, the integration of the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) into production systems has become increasingly important and a critical pathway toward Industry 5.0. Sustainable Value Stream Mapping (Sus-VSM) provides a structured approach for assessing economic, environmental, and social performance, but its practical adoption remains limited, and it has not been systematically aligned with SDG Targets. These limitations are particularly evident among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) which often lack the resources needed to implement extensive sustainability indicator sets. This study combines a systematic literature review with industrial evidence to identify Sus-VSM indicators and examine their use in practice. A consolidated set of 18 economic, 22 environmental, and 18 social indicators is derived and mapped to 16 SDG Targets relevant to manufacturing by means of a Delphi-based expert assessment. The mapping results are analysed to evaluate indicator usefulness and expert agreement and are complemented by an industrial verification from 30 companies across different sectors that rates each indicator in terms of relevance to SDGs and applicability in real factory contexts. The results show that economic indicators are most aligned with SDG 8, environmental indicators with SDG 9, SDG 12, and SDG 13, and social indicators with SDG 3 and SDG 8, while gaps persist for water, energy transition, and some climate-related Targets. A prioritised indicator set is proposed that maintains coverage of the selected SDG Targets and remains feasible for SMEs, providing a practically oriented basis for embedding SDG-aligned sustainability assessment within Sus-VSM.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stadnicka et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a3d873ec16d51705d2f501https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14030247
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper