PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 2, 2026Experimental Gerontology0 citationsOpen Access

Effects of body composition on age- and sex-related differences in resting metabolic rate from a healthy aging cohort

View Full Paper
MMMarcos N. MolinéSHStephanie HeimlerNBNikki Bergstrom

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore how body composition affects resting metabolic rate differences related to age and sex.
  • Characterized a cohort of 80 healthy adults aged 23-82 years.
  • Measured body composition using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
  • Assessed resting metabolic rate using indirect calorimetry.
  • Modelled body composition metrics as predictive variables for RMR against age and sex effects.
  • RMR declines with age, with a predicted decrease of 62.6 kcal/day per decade (ꞵ = -62.6, P < 0.0001).
  • Body composition metrics do not fully account for sex differences in RMR individually.
  • Combined body composition metrics explain lower RMR in females compared to males.
  • Additional factors beside body composition contribute to age-related RMR differences.

Abstract

Resting metabolic rate (RMR) accounts for the majority of the total energy expenditure. While RMR is known to decline with advancing age and is recognized to be lower in females compared to males, the mechanisms underlying these differences remain unclear. Changes in body composition are posited to account for age- and sex-related differences in RMR, but to what extent lacks consensus. We characterized 80 healthy adults aged 23-82 years from the San Diego Nathan Shock Center (SD-NSC) clinical cohort for body composition and RMR using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and indirect calorimetry techniques, respectively. Body composition metrics-body surface area (BSA), lean tissue mass (LTM), and total body fat (TBF)-were modelled as predictive variables to assess their explanatory power against the age and sex effects on RMR. We found that the negative association between RMR and age persists even after adjusting for body composition and sex, with a predicted decrease in RMR per decade of 62.6 kcal/day (ꞵ = -62.6, P < 0.0001). While individual body composition metrics do not account for the observed sex differences in RMR, adjusting for all body composition metrics together explained the observation that females have lower RMR compared to males. Our results suggest that while differences in body composition can explain sex differences in RMR, additional factors independent of body composition contribute to age-related differences. These results provide new insights into RMR differences among healthy individuals across the human life-course, which may inform age-appropriate interventions for optimizing metabolism.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moliné et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a528b3f1e85e5c73bf0319https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2026.113084
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper