PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 2, 2026BMJ1 citationsOpen Access

When I use a word . . . The mind’s eye—phantasia, aphantasia, and hyperphantasia

JAJ K Aronson

Key Points

  • The study investigates how individuals differ in their ability to create mental images and the implications for memory and creativity.
  • Review of historical studies on mental imagery by Francis Galton and subsequent research by Zeman and colleagues.
  • Comparison of traits in individuals with varying degrees of visual imagery ability: aphantasia, phantasia, and hyperphantasia.
  • Analysis of potential connections between mental imagery abilities and conditions such as autism and Charles Bonnet syndrome.
  • Most individuals can create mental images, but aphantasiacs have significant limitations in doing so.
  • Aphantasiacs often exhibit poor autobiographical memory but can excel in non-visual creative fields, such as art.
  • Phantasiacs may experience disappointment when visual representations in media do not match their mental images.

Abstract

In 1880 Francis Galton studied people’s ability to create mental images in their mind’s eye. Most people were able to do so, but not scientists. In 2015 Zeman and colleagues labelled this inability aphantasia. The ordinary visual ability they called phantasia and the heightened ability hyperphantasia. People with aphantasia, aphantasiacs, have poor autobiographical memory and dream conceptually, not visually, but they may still be good artists. They may be on the autistic spectrum and have relatives who are also likely to be aphantasiac. And they don’t suffer from a disadvantage that some phantasiacs have, when, having formed visual images of people and places in novels, they are disappointed or even angry when those people and places are realised in a movie and don’t correspond to the images that they have formed in their mind’s eye. People with Charles Bonnet syndrome are blind but nevertheless see visions, labelled as hallucinations, in their mind’s eye; presumably they are phantasiacs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

J K Aronson (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a52920f1e85e5c73bf074bhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s411
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Phantasia in Aristotle: The embodied nature of imagination.2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2mind, n.¹2023 · 1 citations
  3. 3‘That’s not how I pictured it’ – why book-to-film adaptations so often disappoint2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4The art of Aphantasia: how ‘mind blind’ artists create without being able to visualise2021 · 2 citations
  5. 5Aphantasia: ten years since I coined the term for lacking a mind’s eye – the journey so far2024 · 1 citations