PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 20261 citationsOpen Access

Potential Cost-Effectiveness of Machine Learning-Enabled Primary Care Identification of Hepatitis C Virus Patients in the US

View Full Paper
TMThomas C S MartinUniversity of California, San DiegoJWJeremiah WilsonUniversity of California, San DiegoAPA. PitcherIQVIA (United Kingdom)

Key Points

  • This evaluation aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of machine learning-enabled screening for hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients in the U.S.
  • Developed a Markov model to assess cost-effectiveness
  • Compared ML algorithm screening to conventional testing strategies
  • Evaluated different recall levels for identifying HCV patients
  • ML algorithm identified patients 6.5 months earlier than conventional testing
  • Optimal algorithm recall level for cost-effectiveness was 30%
  • Mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $94,022/QALY gained

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) algorithms may be effective at improving the HCV care cascade. One ML algorithm, developed using U. S. ambulatory electronic medical records (EMR), demonstrated the ability to identify people infected with HCV earlier than conventional testing strategies among those with indications for screening. We evaluated the potential cost-effectiveness of ML-enabled screening for the early identification of undiagnosed HCV among people in care in the U. S. An HCV natural history Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the ML algorithm-enabled screening compared to conventional testing over the training data period. Based on the training data, the ML algorithm identified patients on average 6. 5 months earlier than conventional testing strategies. We compared the status quo to intervention scenarios using the ML algorithm at different recall levels (proportion of HCV patients identified, 5–100%). We identified the optimal algorithm recall level, which maximized health (measured in quality-adjusted life years, QALYs) while staying under a willingness-to-pay threshold of USD100, 000/QALY gained. ML-enabled screening was cost-effective (ICER < 100 k/QALY gained) in identifying undiagnosed HCV patients for recall levels up to 30%. The optimal recall level was 30% (Precision 0. 27%), which resulted in a mean ICER of 94, 022/QALY gained. ML-enabled screening for the early identification of undiagnosed HCV patients could be cost-effective in the U. S. Prospective evaluation of real-world effectiveness is warranted.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Martin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a67f1ff353c071a6f0b07ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/v18030299
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper