PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026Mammal Review3 citationsOpen Access

Home Range and Habitat Selection of Chamois: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

View Full Paper
ΚΠΚωνσταντίνος ΠαπακώσταςRCRoberta ChirichellaMAMarco Apollonio

Key Points

  • Chamois exhibit varied home range sizes with individual ranges between 0.04–4.94 km², influenced by factors like sex and seasonal migration.
  • Analysis of habitat selection indicates that topography and human disturbance significantly affect chamois habitat choices across 22 studies.
  • Research primarily focuses on the Alpine chamois, accounting for 68% of studies, while seven subspecies have received minimal attention, indicating a knowledge gap.
  • Conservation management strategies may benefit from understanding chamois responses to human impact and climate changes, with a call for broader studies.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Chamois ( Rupicapra spp.) are widely distributed across Europe and parts of Asia (ten subspecies). Studies on their distribution and habitat selection account for less than 10% of the literature on the genus, and existing research disproportionately focuses on the Alpine chamois ( R. r. rupicapra ). Aims We explored the chamois home range patterns and habitat selection drivers, trends in methodological data collection and analysis tools, and research gaps. Methods We conducted a systematic search (PRISMA guideline) and a meta‐analysis of the peer‐reviewed, English‐language articles that reported quantitative data on home range size or habitat selection, comprising 22 studies spanning 16 study areas. Results and Discussion Knowledge stemmed mainly (68% of studies) from the Alpine subspecies. Seven subspecies remain understudied (0–1 study each). Telemetry and field observations were the primary field methods in home range and habitat selection studies, respectively. Annual individual home ranges were small but varied greatly (0.04–4.94 km 2 ), depending on sex (larger in males), dispersal behaviour (larger in migrating males) and season. Habitat selection analysis (24 factors tested; 452 cases) revealed that topography (elevation, slope, escape terrain) and human disturbance (hunting, infrastructure, hiking trails, livestock) influenced chamois habitat selection. Rocky, grassland and forest habitat use were season‐dependent, and snow‐covered areas were generally avoided. Recommendations We highlight the need for further research on underrepresented and threatened subspecies, as well as on the chamois' responses to human disturbance and climatic variables, to better inform conservation management under global change.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Παπακώστας et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75bbec6e9836116a23a4fhttps://doi.org/10.1111/mam.70023
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper