PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026International Journal of Heart Failure2 citationsOpen Access

Managing Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: In Whom, When, and How?

PPP PapakonstantinouGLG Y H Lip

Key Points

  • Outcome measures include improved survival and reduced hospitalization rates with catheter ablation.
  • Randomized trials support early rhythm control for patients with reduced ejection fraction and symptomatic AF.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Patients with coexisting atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF)
I
Intervention
Atrial fibrillation management strategies including early rhythm control, catheter ablation, and direct oral anticoagulants

Early rhythm control, particularly with catheter ablation, is increasingly favored for managing atrial fibrillation in appropriately selected patients with heart failure.

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are common, interdependent conditions that frequently coexist and amplify each other's progression and adverse outcomes. Managing AF in patients with HF remains complex and requires individualized decisions regarding rhythm vs. rate control, anticoagulation, and comorbidity optimization. Recent randomized trials and updated guidelines have reshaped therapeutic paradigms, favoring early rhythm control in appropriately selected patients. The bidirectional AF-HF interplay involves shared pathophysiological mechanisms-neurohormonal activation, structural remodeling, and atrial myopathy-leading to progressive systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Identifying "in whom" rhythm control yields prognostic benefit is essential, especially among patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) and those with symptomatic AF or tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. Catheter ablation has emerged as a preferred rhythm-control strategy in HF with reduced EF, supported by CASTLE-AF, RAFT-AF, EAST-AFNET 4 and recent meta-analyses showing improved survival and HF hospitalization rates. Novel pulsed-field ablation technologies may further enhance safety in this vulnerable population. Optimal timing ("when") favors early intervention before advanced remodeling, while the choice of "how" depends on AF burden, HF phenotype, and comorbidities. Anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants remains central to reducing thromboembolic risk, with attention to renal function, frailty, and polypharmacy. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence and offers a pragmatic clinical algorithm for managing AF in HF, emphasizing integrated, multidisciplinary, and patient-centered care strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Papakonstantinou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75cc0c6e9836116a25e28https://doi.org/10.36628/ijhf.2025.0107
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper