PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026IET Image Processing0 citationsOpen Access

MEN‐IML: A Multi‐Scale Edge‐Aware Network for Image Manipulation Localisation

View Full Paper
LZLei ZhangYuncheng UniversityXLXiaodong LüYuncheng UniversityQJQinglong JiaYuncheng University

Key Points

  • Average performance improved by 13.5% compared to MVSS-Net++, and 6.3% compared to IML-ViT.
  • Designed an efficient multi-scale edge-aware feature fusion module that enhances edge detail extraction.
  • Utilized depthwise separable convolutional decoders for better spatial and cross-channel feature integration.
  • Cross-dataset experiments on multiple public datasets validate the proposed approach's effectiveness.

Abstract

ABSTRACT With the rapid development of image editing technology, image manipulation localisation is facing increasingly severe challenges. Traditional methods cannot effectively capture tampering features at different scales and fail to fully utilise the tampering trace information at the boundary of the manipulated regions, resulting in limited localisation accuracy. To address these issues, we propose MEN‐IML, a multi‐scale edge‐aware network for image manipulation localisation. First, we design an efficient multi‐scale edge‐aware feature fusion module. This module enhances the expressive capability of edge details by assigning learnable weights to features at different scales and incorporating an edge feature awareness mechanism. Second, we adopt depthwise separable convolutional decoders instead of the traditional multi‐layer perceptron decoders, which not only focus on extracting spatial features of each channel, but also improve the model's ability to integrate cross‐channel information. Finally, we design a multi‐scale edge loss to supervise the boundaries of manipulated regions at multiple scales, effectively enhancing the sensitivity of the model to manipulated region boundaries. Cross‐dataset experimental results on multiple public datasets demonstrate that, compared to mainstream MVSS‐Net++ and the state‐of‐the‐art IML‐ViT, the proposed method improves average performance by 13.5% and 6.3%, effectively enhancing the localisation accuracy of image tampering.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75cfbc6e9836116a26500https://doi.org/10.1049/ipr2.70295
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper