PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Use of Calibrated Screw Technique (CAST) for complex vertebral compression fractures: retrospective evaluation of clinical outcomes and indications.

View Full Paper
MPMarco PileggiUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreFAFrancesco AdduciAzienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di ModenaADAndrea A. DomenighettiNorthwestern University

Key Points

  • CAST improved pain intensity significantly from a mean of 7.7 to 2.7 on the numeric rating scale at six months.
  • 55.3% of patients reported substantial improvement in perceived outcomes at one month, increasing to 69.8% by six months.
  • The technique was technically feasible in all cases, with only one refracture observed in 155 treated vertebral levels.
  • New fracture incidence decreased significantly over the six-month follow-up period.

Abstract

Background Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), characterized by middle column involvement, osteonecrotic clefts, split morphology, or pedicle fractures, pose biomechanical challenges that reduce the effectiveness of conventional vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. We evaluated the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of the Calibrated Screw Technique (CAST), a minimally invasive approach combining percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and targeted cement augmentation, in patients with complex VCFs.Methods We retrospectively analyzed 147 consecutive patients (155 vertebral levels; mean age 80.1 years), primarily with osteoporotic fractures (80.6%), treated using CAST. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were collected at baseline, and at 1 and 6 months. Pain intensity was measured by the numeric rating scale (NRS), and patient perceived outcomes were assessed using patient global impression of change (PGIC). Radiographic outcomes included refracture rates at treated vertebrae, incidence of new fractures, and kyphotic angle correction in mobile fractures.Results CAST was technically feasible in all cases without major complications. Mean NRS scores improved significantly from 7.7 before the procedure to 3.6 at 1 month and 2.7 at 6 months (P < 0.0001). At the 1 month follow-up, 55.3% of patients reported feeling 'extremely' or 'much improved' on PGIC, increasing to 69.8% at 6 months. Radiographically, only one asymptomatic refracture occurred at 1 month (0.8%) and none at 6 months. New fracture incidence decreased from 13.8% at 1 month to 4.2% at 6 months.Conclusions In this study, CAST provided a safe, technically feasible, and durable solution for stabilization and pain relief in complex VCFs unsuitable for conventional augmentation, highlighting its value for challenging VCFs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pileggi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75d2dc6e9836116a26c82https://doi.org/10.48620/94092
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper