PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 20260 citations

The European Arrest Warrant before the Irish Higher Courts: Judicial Dialogue, Mutual Trust, and the Limits of Interpretation

IMImelda MaherRRRónán RiordanNŠNeža Šubic

Key Points

  • The case law reveals limits to judicial interpretation of the European Arrest Warrant.
  • Between 2010 and 2020, trends in EAW decisions highlight issues regarding mutual trust among Member States.
  • Observational analysis of EAW decisions sheds light on the relationship between EU and Irish law.
  • This examination suggests a crucial need for clarity amidst evolving constitutional issues post-Brexit.

Abstract

Abstract: One of the most common EU law issues before the Irish Superior Courts is the European Arrest Warrant (EAW). Outlining the EAW Framework Decision (FD), before turning to an analysis of its statutory implementation in Ireland, this article analyses data gathered between 2010 and 2020 as to the frequency of EAW decisions; at which courts they arise; what Member States seek surrender; how often surrender is granted; and the extent to which the Irish courts engage with, and their experience of, the preliminary reference procedure. Key themes in the case law are identified using qualitative methods: the relationship between EU and Irish law is explored through an analysis of the duty of conforming interpretation under EU law; constitutional issues are explored through case law on legal aid entitlements during EAW proceedings; the horizontal impact of Irish preliminary references for other national legal orders is explored through cases raising the principle of mutual trust; and the impact of Brexit is also explored.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share

Cite This Study

Maher et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75fadc6e9836116a2b4d4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share