PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging1 citations

Comparison of SYNTAX scores between coronary CT angiography and invasive coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
HMHazhir MoradiSTSeyed Reza TabibianMPMahdi Saberi Pirouz

Key Points

  • SYNTAX scores differ significantly between the two angiography methods, highlighting potential diagnostic inconsistencies.
  • The analysis includes data from over 2000 patients, emphasizing extensive variability in assessment.
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis dissect the accuracy of non-invasive and invasive imaging techniques for coronary arteries.
  • Findings may influence future guidelines on using coronary CT angiography in assessing coronary artery disease.
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moradi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a76017c6e9836116a2c82ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-026-03626-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Coronary Angiography Is the Gold Standard for Patients with Significant Left Ventricular Dysfunction2013 · 23 citations
  2. 2Global Effect of Modifiable Risk Factors on Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality2023 · 866 citations
  3. 3Cardiac computed tomography in current cardiology guidelines2015 · 88 citations
  4. 4Low Diagnostic Yield of Elective Coronary Angiography2010 · 1,671 citations
  5. 5Prognostic Value of the SYNTAX Score in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention2011 · 269 citations