PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026Cell Reports Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

Asymmetrical resource behaviors shape key leverage points for sustainability synergies and trade-offs across China’s food supply chain

View Full Paper
YZYuxi ZhengTsinghua UniversityDGDabo GuanTsinghua UniversityJHJingke HongChongqing University

Key Points

  • Asymmetrical resource behaviors significantly influence sustainability outcomes across food supply chains.
  • By 2050, up to 96.77% of regions may depend on unsustainable resource use for food demands.
  • Assessment using a supernetwork framework highlights important systemic interactions and vulnerabilities.
  • Identifying localized leverage points may help realign sustainability trajectories for food supply chains.

Abstract

Summary Ensuring global food security requires understanding fine-scale sustainability trade-offs and synergies within food supply chains (FSCs). Here, we develop a supernetwork framework that refines analysis to detailed FSC activities by incorporating China's 92 region-sector-product nodes to diagnose resource consumption, efficiency dynamics, and systemic interactions. The analysis shows pronounced asymmetries in resource behaviors across China's FSCs. By 2050, 87.10%–96.77% of regions will rely on planetary boundary transgressions for water or land use to meet food demands. The most resource-intensive 1% of activities, typically western pork production and coastal soybean trade, drive a disproportionate 12.24%–20.23% of water and 28.19%–31.03% of land consumption, exposing critical FSC vulnerabilities. Downstream efficiency gains enhance food accessibility but simultaneously intensify water-land consumption and systemic risks. Yet, midstream activities offer overlooked synergetic potential, achieving robust efficiency improvements (132.79%–177.18%) independent of resource use. These granular insights identify localized, actionable leverage points to realign FSC sustainability trajectories.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7606cc6e9836116a2d258https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsus.2025.100614
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Global and regional drivers of land-use emissions in 1961–20172021 · 592 citations
  2. 2Random hypergraphs and their applications2009 · 276 citations
  3. 3The representative concentration pathways: an overview2011 · 8,048 citations
  4. 4Mapping the spatial heterogeneity of global land use and land cover from 2020 to 2100 at a 1 km resolution2023 · 186 citations
  5. 5Structural Modeling and Characteristics Analysis of Flow Interaction Networks in the Internet2015 · 7 citations