PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026International Journal of Medical Informatics1 citations

Healthcare practitioner involvement in data-driven clinical decision support development and evaluation: Critical narrative review of recommendations

View Full Paper
RERuth P. EvansLBLOUISE BRYANTGRGregor Russell

Key Points

  • Effective clinical decision support development relies on active healthcare practitioner involvement, enhancing outcomes.
  • Key recommendations emphasize collaboration and shared ownership in developing data-driven tools for practitioners.
  • Narrative review includes insights from recent literature, highlighting challenges in integrating practitioner knowledge.
  • Findings indicate that practitioner engagement may improve the relevance and usability of decision support systems.
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Evans et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a76197c6e9836116a2f9ebhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106360
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1User perspectives on an electronic decision-support tool performing comprehensive medication reviews - a focus group study with physicians and nurses2015 · 56 citations
  2. 2How to Read Articles That Use Machine Learning2019 · 528 citations
  3. 3Evaluating artificial intelligence in medicine: phases of clinical research2020 · 157 citations
  4. 4The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews2021 · 13,906 citations
  5. 5MINIMAR (MINimum Information for Medical AI Reporting): Developing reporting standards for artificial intelligence in health care2020 · 421 citations