PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Adhesive Characterization of Acacia mangium Bark Extract and Its Effects on Properties and Formaldehyde Emissions of Rubberwood Particleboard

WYWissanee YingprasertPrince of Songkla UniversitySPSuparat PeaklinPrince of Songkla University

Key Points

  • Adhesive properties improved with catalysts, reducing gel time significantly with sodium hydroxide and boric acid.
  • The BE–NaOH adhesive showed high thermal stability and comparable viscosity to commercial urea formaldehyde adhesive.
  • Particleboards bonded with Acacia mangium bark extract met key requirements for mechanical performance and formaldehyde emissions.
  • Future work required on enhancing water resistance to compete with conventional adhesive systems like urea formaldehyde.

Abstract

This study evaluated the feasibility of using Acacia mangium bark extract (BE) as a bio-based, formaldehyde-free adhesive for rubberwood particleboard, focusing on the effects of two catalysts: sodium hydroxide (alkaline) and boric acid (acidic). Gel time, viscosity, thermal behavior, mechanical performance, and formaldehyde emissions were assessed. The uncatalyzed BE adhesive showed a gel time of 29.59 min, which decreased to 6.44 min with sodium hydroxide (BE–NaOH adhesive) and 4.22 min with boric acid (BE–Boric adhesive), highlighting the catalytic effect. Differential scanning calorimetry revealed higher curing enthalpy for BE–NaOH adhesive, while thermogravimetric analysis indicated enhanced thermal stability under alkaline conditions. The viscosity of BE–NaOH adhesive was comparable to commercial urea formaldehyde (UF) adhesive. Particleboards (density 0.65 g/cm3) bonded with BE–NaOH, BE, or BE–Boric adhesive met the JIS A 5908:2015 Type 8 internal bond (IB ≥ 0.15 N/mm2) requirement. Boards bonded with BE achieved a modulus of rupture of 8.25 N/mm2, meeting the Type 8 threshold (≥ 8 N/mm2), while those with BE–NaOH adhesive showed 7.61 N/mm2, slightly below it. Formaldehyde emissions were very low (0.006–0.058 mg/L), achieving the F**** rating under JIS A 5908:2015. However, high thickness swelling and water absorption indicated limited water resistance, and overall mechanical properties remained lower than with UF/melamine urea formaldehyde (MUF) adhesives. Direct mechanical performance comparison with UF/MUF was not possible due to the lack of molar ratio data. These findings suggest BE adhesives are a promising sustainable alternative, though further improvements in water resistance and mechanical performance are needed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yingprasert et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a765d6badf0bb9e87daa77https://doi.org/10.5658/wood.2026.54.1.110
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper