PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología3 citationsOpen Access

ChatNVD: Advancing Cybersecurity Vulnerability Assessment With Large Language Models

View Full Paper
SCSidhant ChopraHAHussain AhmadDGDiksha Goel

Key Points

  • Enhanced vulnerability assessment was achieved using ChatNVD, showing over 92% exact-match accuracy.
  • GPT-4o Mini consistently outperformed its counterparts with lower hallucination and error rates.
  • The framework leverages the National Vulnerability Database for improved accessibility of vulnerability information.
  • Adopting retrieval-augmented workflows in cybersecurity supports operational decision-making and increases effectiveness.

Abstract

The increasing frequency and sophistication of cybersecurity vulnerabilities in software systems underscores the need for robust and reliable vulnerability assessment methods. However, existing approaches often rely on highly technical and abstract frameworks, limiting accessibility for practitioners and increasing the risk of exploitation. In this paper, we introduce ChatNVD, a support tool powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) that leverages the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) to enhance the accessibility of vulnerability information. We develop three variants of ChatNVD using GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI), LLaMA 3 (Meta), and Gemini 1.5 Pro (Google). To evaluate their performance, we design a benchmark of structured queries derived from real CVE records, covering temporal, descriptive, and metric-based attributes. Our results show that GPT-4o Mini consistently outperforms the other models, achieving over 92% exact-match accuracy with lower hallucination and error rates. These findings demonstrate the potential of lightweight, retrieval-augmented LLM workflows for supporting vulnerability management and operational decision-making in cybersecurity contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chopra et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a765ebbadf0bb9e87daf11https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2026.3659205
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper