PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026The Journal of Arthroplasty0 citations

Mixing Components from Different Manufacturers in Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of the American Joint Replacement Registry

View Full Paper
GKGregory J. KirchnerIZIsabella ZanilettiADAyushmita De

Key Points

  • Mixing components from different manufacturers can lead to varying joint replacement outcomes, impacting patient recovery.
  • A registry analysis evaluated clinical outcomes across numerous cases, highlighting significant differences in component performance.
  • This analysis utilized data from the American Joint Replacement Registry to assess the effects of component combinations.
  • These findings emphasize the need for careful selection and potential standardization in total hip arthroplasty practices.
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kirchner et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7667fbadf0bb9e87dd3aehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2026.01.071
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1An Update on Cementless Femoral Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty2020 · 83 citations
  2. 2Dual mobility cups in total hip arthroplasty2014 · 189 citations
  3. 3The risk of revision after total hip arthroplasty in young patients depends on surgical approach, femoral head size and bearing type; an analysis of 19,682 operations in the Dutch arthroplasty register2019 · 37 citations
  4. 4Changing practice to a new-generation triple-taper collared femoral component reduces periprosthetic fracture rates after primary total hip arthroplasty2024 · 18 citations
  5. 5A Comparison of Revision Rates and Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with 28, 32, and 36-mm Femoral Heads and Different Cup Sizes2022 · 23 citations