PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026Franklin Open0 citationsOpen Access

New efficient calibrated estimators for the population distribution function using two auxiliary variables

View Full Paper
ASAfsar Basha S.M.MUM. Usman

Key Points

  • Superior performance of the proposed estimators shows lower absolute bias and mean squared error.
  • The numerical study utilized real datasets to validate the proposed calibrated estimators.
  • Optimized calibration weights were derived for various scenarios under simple random sampling conditions.
  • Results suggest the method improves efficiency in estimating the population distribution function across different fields.

Abstract

The population distribution function (DF) plays a crucial role in public health; its applications include modeling drug absorption/clearance rates, guiding personalized dosage decisions, and understanding patterns of infectious period durations. It is also used to quantify the fraction of the population exceeding dangerously high exposure or emergency disease markers. Beyond public health, the DF is widely used in geography, environmental science, and agriculture. It supports soil-quality assessment across regions and informs environmental standards for contaminants such as arsenic in groundwater and particulate matter like PM2.5. This study proposes novel calibrated estimators for the population distribution function using two auxiliary variables under simple random sampling. We derive optimal calibration weights for various practical scenarios and formulate the corresponding estimators. A numerical study using two real datasets was conducted, and the findings are further supported through a simulation study. The outcomes are compared with unbiased, ratio, and regression estimators using both single and two auxiliary variables. We observed that the performance of the proposed estimators is superior, demonstrating lower absolute bias (ABS), lower mean squared error (MSE), and higher percent relative efficiency (PRE). The results highlight the effectiveness of the proposed estimators and encourage survey practitioners to apply them in real-world scenarios.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

S.M. et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a767b8badf0bb9e87e2171https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fraope.2026.100524
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper