PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Training the pronunciation of L2 vowels under different conditions: the use of non-lexical materials and masking noise

View Full Paper
JBJoan Carles Mora BonillaMDMireia Ortega DuranIPIngrid Mora Plaza

Key Points

  • Non-lexical training yielded better outcomes for L2 vowel contrast production among bilingual learners, improving pronunciation accuracy.
  • Participants trained in noise showed poorer results in non-lexical tasks, but lexical training was unaffected by the noise factor.
  • Assessment utilized spectral distance scores, measuring the accuracy of vowel production against native speakers' pronunciations.
  • Observations revealed a decrease in vowel accuracy when elicited in isolated words rather than in sentence contexts, affecting non-lexical training results.

Abstract

The current study extends traditional perceptual high-variability phonetic training (HVPT) in a foreign language learning context by implementing a comprehensive training paradigm that combines perception (discrimination and identification) and production (immediate repetition) training tasks and by exploring two potentially enhancing training conditions: the use of non-lexical training stimuli and the presence of masking noise during production training. We assessed training effects on L1-Spanish/Catalan bilingual EFL learners' production of a difficult English vowel contrast (/æ/-/ʌ/). The participants (N = 62) were randomly assigned to either non-lexical (N = 24) or lexical (N = 24) training and were further subdivided into two groups, one trained in noise (N = 12) and one in silence (N = 12). An untrained control group (N = 14) was also tested. Training gains, measured through spectral distance scores (Euclidean distances) with respect to native speakers' productions of /æ/ and /ʌ/, were assessed through delayed word and sentence repetition tasks. The results showed an advantage of non-lexical training over lexical training, detrimental effects of noise for participants trained with nonwords, but not for those trained with words, and less accurate production of vowels elicited in isolated words than in words embedded in sentences, where training gains were only observable for participants trained with nonwords.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bonilla et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7684abadf0bb9e87e4464https://hdl.handle.net/2445/226690
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper