PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 20260 citations

Adaptive Neuromuscular Co-Contraction Strategies Under Varying Approach Speeds and Distances During Single-Leg Jumping: An Exploratory Study

HPHsien-Te Peng彭彭賢德

Key Points

  • Joint stiffness and muscle activation significantly vary with approach speed and distance during jumping.
  • Analysis used a two-way repeated-measures ANOVA to evaluate interactions between speed and distance conditions.
  • Significant changes in joint co-contraction ratios were observed during pre-activation, braking, and push-off phases.
  • Adaptive neuromuscular strategies could enhance jump performance and reduce the risk of injury in athletes.

Abstract

[abstract]Purpose: This study investigated how variations in approach speed and distance influence lower-limb muscle activation, joint co-contraction ratios (CCRs), and mechanical joint stiffness during single-leg approach run jump landings (ARJSL), to clarify adaptive neuromuscular strategies for joint stiffness regulation. Methods: Twenty-five physically active male university students performed ARJSLs under six randomized conditions combining two approach speeds (fast > 4.0 m/s; slow < 4.0 m/s) and three approach distances (3, 6, and 9 m). Surface electromyography (sEMG) from five dominant-limb muscles—rectus femoris, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, and soleus—was analyzed across three movement phases: pre-activation, downward (braking), and push-off. Knee and ankle CCRs were computed, while kinematic and kinetic data were used to calculate mechanical joint stiffness via inverse dynamics. A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA evaluated the main and interaction effects of approach speed and distance. Results: Significant speed × distance interactions were observed for tibialis anterior activation, several CCRs, and eccentric ankle stiffness (p < 0.05). Pre-activation knee CCR increased with longer, faster approaches, indicating anticipatory joint pre-stiffening. During braking, greater ankle co-contraction under fast–9 m conditions coincided with reduced mechanical ankle stiffness, suggesting a compensatory yielding strategy under high kinetic loads. In the push-off phase, faster approaches elicited higher concentric stiffness at the hip and ankle, supporting efficient energy transfer. Rectus femoris and gastrocnemius activation scaled with both approach speed and distance. Conclusions: Athletes adapt neuromuscular co-contraction and mechanical stiffness in a coordinated, phase-dependent manner to balance protection and performance. These insights may inform targeted training strategies for enhancing jump efficiency and mitigating ACL injury risk.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share

Cite This Study

Peng et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7686cbadf0bb9e87e4a3b
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share