PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Urban forestry & urban greening1 citationsOpen Access

A Typo-Morphological Approach to Frontage Zones’ Potential for Urban Green Infrastructure

View Full Paper
JMJulia MicklewrightJSJulia SchillerYDYole DeBellis

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the potential of frontage zones for urban green infrastructure by refining GIS methods and exploring their characteristics.
  • Refined GIS method to map frontage zones and their morphological characteristics
  • Conducted an exploratory data analysis to assess relationships between morphological traits and vegetation cover
  • Employed hierarchical clustering to categorize types of frontage zones across varied urban structures
  • Identified six frontage types with distinct morphological and vegetation characteristics
  • Frontage depth emerged as the most significant variable influencing vegetation cover
  • Including frontage zones in planning could effectively double Munich's green cover
  • Established strong interrelations between street vegetation and frontage zone characteristics
  • Categories of frontage types offer valuable insights for strategic UGI planning

Abstract

Street networks are central to strategies aimed at extending urban green infrastructure (UGI) as they represent a multifunctional network that spans entire urban areas. However, competition of uses in these zones is intense; therefore, adjacent surfaces between the property line and the facade should also be considered for streetscape greening. The potential of frontage zones, also known as front gardens or yards, has been little explored in research and requires enhanced methods to assess their capacity to extend the UGI. This study refines a GIS method to identify frontage zones, their morphological characteristics, and vegetation cover. Subsequently, an exploratory data analysis provides insights into the relationship between morphological and vegetation characteristics. Lastly, a hierarchical clustering approach helps define types of frontage zones and highlights those which hold particular value for the integration of UGI. The study encompasses frontage zones across the entire municipal area of Munich, Germany, thereby including a variety of urban structure types. The results categorise six frontage types with varying morphological and vegetation cover characteristics. They indicate that frontage depth is the most influential variable for vegetation coverage, and that frontage types are distributed across multiple urban structure types. These findings underscore the untapped potential of the various frontage types in increasing vegetation cover in streetscapes and advocate for their strategic inclusion in UGI planning strategies. • Provided GIS method maps frontage morphology and vegetation across urban types • Including frontage zones doubles the total green cover of Munich’s streetscapes • Frontage depth is the key factor defining frontage types • Street and frontage zone vegetation are strongly interrelated • Frontage types guide UGI planning to leverage private green potential

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Micklewright et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cc4cd48f933b5eed7f1chttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2026.129383
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper