PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Prevalence of HIV among healthcare workers in the post-HAART era – a systematic review and meta-analysis

RDRoland DielANA. Nienhaus

Key Points

  • The study aims to synthesize global data on HIV prevalence among healthcare workers and evaluate regional differences.
  • Conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for studies from 1996 to September 2025.
  • Extracted data on study design, sample size, and HIV-positive cases.
  • Performed random-effects meta-analyses to estimate pooled prevalence by WHO region.
  • Assessed methodological quality using the Westermann score.
  • Identified 220 studies, with 14 meeting inclusion criteria from 12 countries.
  • Pooled HIV prevalence among 7,705 healthcare workers was 0.68% (95% CI 0.19–2.46).
  • Sub-Saharan Africa showed a higher pooled prevalence of 7.1% (95% CI 3.3–12.7).
  • No HIV-positive healthcare workers were detected in Europe, Latin America, and the Eastern Mediterranean.

Abstract

Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at potential risk of HIV infection through occupational exposure. However, with the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), universal precautions, and post-exposure prophylaxis, the global risk profile has changed. Objective: This study synthesized data on HIV prevalence among HCWs worldwide to assess current epidemiological patterns and to evaluate regional heterogeneity. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for studies reporting serological evidence of HIV infection among HCWs published between 1996 and September 2025, corresponding to the post-HAART era. Data were extracted on study design, sample size, and the number of HIV-positive cases. Prevalence estimates were compared with internal control groups or with national background prevalence data obtained from UNAIDS. Methodological quality was assessed using the Westermann score. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled HIV prevalence by WHO region. Results: Of 220 studies identified, 14 from 12 countries met inclusion criteria. Across 7,705 HCWs tested, the overall pooled HIV prevalence was 0.68% (95% CI 0.19–2.46) with extreme heterogeneity (I²=94.3%, τ²=5.003). Whilst the pooled prevalence among HCWs in Sub-Saharan Africa was 7.1% (95 % CI 3.3–12.7), all other regions—Europe, Latin America, and the Eastern Mediterranean—showed pooled prevalences of 0.0% (95% CI 0.0–3.7), with no HIV-positive HCWs detected. Conclusions: HIV infection among HCWs is now exceedingly rare worldwide, with elevated prevalence confined to high-endemic African regions as a regional dichotomy. The findings indicate that HIV infection in HCWs is primarily driven by community transmission rather than occupational exposure and highlight the success of infection-control policies and ART expansion in eliminating workplace transmission. Sustained surveillance and equitable access to protective equipment and post-exposure prophylaxis remain essential to preserve this major occupational-health achievement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Diel et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7ccb2d48f933b5eed8728https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000634
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper