PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026JASA Express Letters0 citationsOpen Access

A critical perspective on inclusion and diversity in soundscape studies

View Full Paper
KCK. ChatburnKBK. van den BoschATArezoo Talebzadeh

Key Points

  • The paper aims to highlight biases in soundscape studies that neglect social and cultural diversity and propose an intersectional, inclusive approach.
  • Critique of existing soundscape research methodologies
  • Reflection on the roles of diverse listeners
  • Advocacy for adaptive methodologies to improve inclusivity
  • Identification of biases favoring Western norms in soundscape interpretation
  • Call for recognizing aural diversity in research
  • Highlighting the need for equitable acoustic environments in design and research

Abstract

Despite acknowledging social and cultural variations, human soundscape research often prioritises generalized interpretations. The universal assumption of the restorativeness of natural sounds, idealised through Western norms, exemplifies this homogenization. This paper critiques such biases, advocating for an intersectional approach. Through reflection on "who" is listening and "how," attention is drawn to those currently excluded from the conversation, honoring aural diversity and broader social and cultural contexts. We call for inclusive and adaptive methodologies to further the creation of equitable acoustic environments that challenge normative assumptions and celebrate the richness of human perception, advancing both research and design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chatburn et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cd3dd48f933b5eed959ahttps://doi.org/10.1121/10.0042697
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper