PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026American Journal of Epidemiology0 citations

Referral of patients with cognitive impairment to specialty memory care: associations with patient-centered outcomes and specificity of diagnoses

View Full Paper
EFErin L FergusonSMSilvia MiramontesJWJustin S. White

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the association between referrals for cognitive impairment and impacts on patient-centered outcomes.
  • Evaluated referrals in a healthcare system using electronic health records
  • Compared traditional and instrumental variable (IV) analyses
  • Analyzed 14 patient-centered outcomes over 5 years of follow-up
  • Applied Aalen additive hazards models to model associations
  • 15% of older adults were referred to memory care at diagnosis.
  • Referrals were linked to a 0.09 increase in the cumulative hazard of receiving a specific cognitive diagnosis by year 5.
  • Referral showed a reduced hazard of ICD-defined weight loss by -0.35, suggesting possible benefits.

Abstract

Primary care providers (PCPs) may consider referring patients with cognitive impairment to clinicians specializing in memory care. We evaluated whether referrals are associated with quality-of-care and diagnostic outcomes, comparing estimates based on traditional and instrumental variables (IV) analyses. Analyses included individuals diagnosed with memory loss, mild cognitive impairment, or Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) in a single healthcare system after 2005. Electronic health records were used to define referral to specialists and PCP preference (instrument) for referring. We modeled traditional and IV associations between referral to care and 14 patient-centered outcomes over 5 years of follow-up using adjusted Aalen additive hazards models. Overall, 1019 (15%) older adults were referred at diagnosis. Preference strongly predicted actual referral (F-statistic = 637). Referral was observationally associated with increased cumulative hazard of receiving a more specific cognitive diagnosis (hazard difference at year 5: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.04-0.15) and depression (0.09, 95% CI, 0.01-0.18). Using IV, referral was significantly associated with decreased hazard of ICD-defined weight loss (-0.35, 95% CI: -0.60,-0.09); other estimates were imprecise and consistent with possible benefits or harms. Given barriers in accessing specialty care, it is critical to further investigate how specialty care affects outcomes of individuals with living with cognitive impairment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ferguson et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cd5ed48f933b5eed9982https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag034
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper