PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders2 citationsOpen Access

Stenting for Symptomatic Left Renal Vein Compression in Patients with Complex Pelvic Venous Disease Is Safe on Long-Term Follow Up

View Full Paper
HAHind AnanUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterYSYashashwini SudinaUniversity of PittsburghNSNatalie SridharanUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of stenting for symptomatic left renal vein compression.
  • Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing LRV stenting from 2010 to 2024.
  • Data on baseline characteristics, complications, and symptom resolution were collected.
  • Stenting was analyzed in conjunction with patient demographics and presenting symptoms.
  • Forty-three patients were included, with a median follow-up of 46.5 months.
  • Symptom resolution was achieved in 90.7% of patients, with no major complications.
  • Primary patency was 89.9% at 1 year and 82.8% at 4 years.

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction The ideal treatment for symptomatic left renal vein (LRV) compression continues to be debated, with several available open and endovascular options. Concerns about percutaneous stenting have been raised due to risk of stent migration, fracture, and erosion. This study aims to assess the long-term safety, patency, and effectiveness of LRV stenting. Methods A retrospective institutional chart review of all patients undergoing LRV stenting for symptomatic LRV compression between 2010 and 2024 was conducted. Baseline characteristics, operative details, complications, re-interventions, and symptom resolution were collected. Complete resolution was defined as full relief of presenting symptoms; partial resolution as patient-reported improvement without full relief; and no relief as no change from preoperative symptoms. Results A total of 44 patients were identified. Forty-three patients with complete follow-up were included in the analysis. A total of 13 patients underwent LRV transposition for symptomatic compression at our institution in the same time frame; out of which 6 required stenting due to symptom recurrence and were included in the analysis. Mean age was 42.6 years (range: 17.6-79.1). Body mass index ranged from 15.2 to 42.5 kg/m2. Most of the patients were female (42/43) and white (41/43). Thirty (69.8%) patients had a concomitant diagnosis of pelvic congestion syndrome. Seven patients underwent stenting for recurrence after LRV transposition. Pelvic or lower abdominal pain was the most common presenting symptom (35/43), followed by flank pain (25/43) and hematuria (18/43). Thirty-nine patients received a single stent, while four had two stents at index procedure. The stent size ranged from 8 to 16 mm in diameter (median 14 mm) and 30 to 60 mm in length (median 40 mm). Dedicated venous stents were used in 42% of patients after 2019. Intravascular ultrasound was used in the majority of patients (32/43, 74.4%). Sixteen patients (36.4%) underwent concomitant gonadal vein embolization. The median clinical follow-up was 46.5 months (Interquartile range: 23.7-82.2 months). No major peri-operative complications were reported. No stent migration, embolization, or vein pseudoaneurysm occurred. One case of complete stent occlusion was reported. The primary patency was 89.9% at 1 year and 82.8% at 4 years, while the primary-assisted patency remained at 100%. Symptom resolution was achieved in 90.7% (39/43) of patients (24 complete, 15 partial). Two patients eventually underwent auto-transplantation, three underwent nephrectomy (one for cancer) and one had a stent explant due to persistent pain despite patent stents. Conclusion LRV stenting for symptomatic compression offers a minimally invasive approach and results in high symptom resolution and patency with no major stent complications at long-term follow-up. It can continue to be a treatment option where appropriate expertise is available.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91cbed6127c7a504bfb91https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2026.102469
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Intracardiac migration of a left renal vein stent after endovascular treatment of nutcracker-associated pelvic congestion syndrome: a case report2026
  2. 2Ovarian vein interventions in patients with combined radiologically significant left renal vein compression and symptomatic pelvic vein reflux2026
  3. 3Clinical outcome of percutaneous angioplasty and covered stent placement for treatment of left brachiocephalic vein obstruction in hemodialysis patients2024
  4. 4Improvement of quality of life in women ≤ 25-years-old with chronic pelvic pain following stenting of nonthrombotic iliac vein compression2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Evaluation of iliocaval venous stenting in management of patients with chronic venous obstructions2024