PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026Environment Development and Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

The impact of the factor mobility on urban-rural income inequality: evidence from China

CWC. WangYDYamin Du

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze how factor mobility impacts income inequality between urban and rural areas in China.
  • Conducted an empirical analysis of income effects from factor mobility in different regions of China.
  • Examined regional heterogeneity in the impacts of factor mobility on income growth.
  • Investigated the role of urban-rural dualistic economic structure as a mediator.
  • Analyzed the threshold effect of land transfer rates on income effects.
  • Urban-rural factor mobility contributes to income growth and reduces income inequality.
  • Income-enhancing effects are more significant in eastern China compared to western regions.
  • Higher industrial structure upgrading correlates with a weaker gap-reducing effect.
  • Land transfer rate increases lead to a marginally increasing income-boosting effect.

Abstract

During China’s process of industrialization and urbanization, the urban-rural dualistic segmentation results in lagging cultivation of rural factor market and asymmetric evolution of urban-rural factor markets. The empirical study demonstrates that the urban-rural factor mobility contributes to income growth while narrowing the income gap. And this income effect of factor mobility exhibits an accelerating pattern. Heterogeneity examination further reveals that the income-enhancing effect is more pronounced in eastern China relative to other regions. However, in regions with a higher industrial structure upgrading index, its gap-reducing effect is relatively weaker. Additionally, the urban-rural dualistic economic structure functions as a mediator in the income effect of factor mobility. Land transfer rate exhibits a threshold effect. Specifically, as the transfer rate increases, the income-boosting effect of factor mobility exhibits a marginally increasing trend. Therefore, this paper proposes a framework of “institutional empowerment ─ rights reinforcement ─ market-driven value creation”. Centered on rural land property rights reform as the catalyst, this approach takes the attraction of urban and rural talent as the endogenous driver, while leveraging social capital and government agricultural subsidies as exogenous drivers. This streamlined policy pathway theoretically underlines the central mechanism of rural land system reform in guiding other factors into rural areas, and in practice highlights the irreplaceability of market mechanisms in allocating various rural factors. Its goals are to realize the agricultural value appreciation and facilitate coordinated urban-rural development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91cf1d6127c7a504bfc21https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-026-07455-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper