PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics0 citationsOpen Access

A cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of missed canals in endodontically treated teeth in Central India population: A retrospective cross-sectional study

View Full Paper
YRYogesh RathodPSPratima R ShenoiPKPriya Kanhehar

Key Points

  • This study aims to determine the prevalence of missed canals in endodontically treated mandibular first molars and their association with extra roots.
  • Evaluated 400 CBCT scans of endodontically treated mandibular first molars
  • Recorded unfilled canals from the cementoenamel junction to the apex as missed canals
  • Assessed presence of extra roots and conducted statistical analysis using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests.
  • Detected missed canals in 88 teeth, prevalence of 22.0%
  • Identified extra roots in 15 teeth (3.75%), 11 of which (73.3%) had missed canals
  • Higher prevalence of missed canals in teeth with extra roots (73.3% vs. 20.0%) with significant statistical difference (P < 0.001).

Abstract

Abstract Background: Missed root canals are a common cause of endodontic failure and are often related to complex root canal anatomy that cannot be adequately visualized using conventional radiography. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) allows three-dimensional assessment and improves the detection of untreated canals. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of missed canals in endodontically treated mandibular first molars in a Central Indian population and to evaluate their association with extra roots. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated 400 CBCT scans of endodontically treated mandibular first molars obtained from government and private imaging centers in Central India. Canals appearing unfilled from the cementoenamel junction to the apex were recorded as missed canals. The presence of extra roots was also assessed. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. Results: Missed canals were detected in 88 teeth, representing a prevalence of 22.0%. Extra roots were identified in 15 (3.75%) teeth, of which 11 (73.3%) exhibited missed canals. Teeth with extra roots showed a significantly higher prevalence of missed canals compared to those without extra roots (73.3% vs. 20.0%; χ 2 = 20.92, P < 0.001), with an 11-fold increased odds (odds ratio = 11.0). No significant association was observed between gender and missed canals ( P = 1.00). Conclusion: CBCT revealed a high prevalence of missed canals in mandibular first molars, with extra roots significantly increasing the risk. These findings emphasize the clinical value of CBCT in detecting anatomical complexities and preventing endodontic treatment failure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rathod et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91db5d6127c7a504c0cc6https://doi.org/10.4103/jcde.jcde_1078_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Bridging the gap in aberrant root canal systems: Case series2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2Volumetric correlation of periapical lesion with Orstavik’s periapical index: A retrospective cone-beam computed tomographic study2024 · 10 citations
  3. 3Predicting early endodontic treatment failure following primary root canal treatment2024 · 33 citations
  4. 4On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a review2006 · 1,109 citations
  5. 5Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well‐treated teeth can fail2001 · 1,058 citations