PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026Biomechanics0 citationsOpen Access

Intraday and Interday Reliability of Horizontal Upper Body Push and Pull Isometric Strength Qualities Using the VALD DynaMo Max Dynamometer

View Full Paper
IČIvan ČurovićUniversity of LancashireMMMilan MarkovićTelekom Srbija (Serbia)LTLazar ToskićUniverzitet Union Nikola Tesla

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the reliability of horizontal upper body isometric push and pull tests.
  • Fifty-two recreationally active individuals participated in two testing sessions 48 hours apart.
  • Each session included three maximal-effort trials at 90° elbow flexion using the VALD DynaMo Max dynamometer.
  • Key metrics like peak force, rate of force development, impulse, and time-to-peak force were analyzed.
  • Peak force demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC = 0.97–0.99).
  • Impulse showed good-to-excellent reliability (ICC = 0.90–0.94).
  • Rate of force development exhibited good reliability but higher variability (ICC = 0.80–0.81).
  • Time-to-peak force had the lowest reliability (ICC = 0.68–0.71).

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the intraday and interday reliability of seated horizontal upper body (UB) isometric push and pull tests performed with the VALD DynaMo Max dynamometer. Methods: Fifty-two recreationally active individuals (41 men, 11 women; 25.0 ± 6.1 years) completed two sessions 48 h apart, each comprising three maximal-effort push and pull trials at 90° elbow flexion using a custom-built rig with the attached dynamometer. Peak force (PF), peak rate of force development (RFD), impulse, and time-to-PF were extracted from 1200 Hz force–time data. Reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV%), standard error of measure (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results: PF demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC = 0.97–0.99) with low absolute error (CV 24%; MDC = 1.5–1.7 s). Conclusions: Horizontal isometric push and pull tests using the VALD DynaMo Max dynamometer provide reliable measures of PF and impulse for athlete profiling and tracking substantial longitudinal changes. Peak RFD may be cautiously used for broad cross-sectional comparisons, although its higher variability limits precision in distinguishing smaller inter-individual differences and appears less sensitive to within-individual changes. Time-to-PF demonstrated insufficient reliability for practical application.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Čurović et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91dc3d6127c7a504c0e5bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics6010026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Intraday and Interday Reliability of Maximal and Explosive Handgrip Force–Time Metrics Using the Kinvent K-Grip Handheld Dynamometer2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Between-Session Reliability of Field-Based Assessments of Isometric Neck Strength2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3πForce—Repeatability and Reliability of Peak Force and Rate of Force Development in a Portable Multi-Exercise Device2025
  4. 4Reliability of Different Protocols for Elbow Flexion and Extension Strength Measurement via Hand-held Dynamometer2025
  5. 5Isometric Floor Press: A Valid, Reliable, and Practical Field-Based Assessment of Upper-Body Strength2026