PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026Clinics2 citationsOpen Access

POEM for Zenker’s diverticulum (Z-POEM): Technical advances, challenges and complications – a narrative review

View Full Paper
YFYgor Rocha FernandesMFMateus Pereira FunariCSChristiano Sakai

Key Points

  • The review synthesizes evidence on Z-POEM, focusing on technical evolution, safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness.
  • Conducted a structured narrative review following SANRA guidelines.
  • Systematically searched databases including PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE for relevant literature.
  • Included clinical trials, cohorts, and observational reports on Z-POEM and its variants.
  • Data extraction was independently performed by two reviewers, organized by key themes.
  • Z-POEM achieves over 90% clinical success with durable symptom relief.
  • The safety profile shows low rates of complications like bleeding or perforation.
  • Long-term success rates exceed 85% over 30-40 months, with repeat procedures effective against recurrence.
  • Z-POEM demonstrates superior outcomes compared to flexible endoscopic septotomy.

Abstract

• Z-POEM achieves >90 % clinical success with durable symptom relief. • Technical variations (NiZ-POEM, tunnel-free) broaden clinical applicability. • Safety profile is favorable, with low rates of bleeding or perforation. • Z-POEM compares favorably to flexible septotomy in efficacy and safety. • Cost-effectiveness analyses support Z-POEM in specialized centers. Zenker's Diverticulum (ZD) is a pharyngoesophageal pulsion diverticulum traditionally managed with open surgical or endoscopic (rigid and flexible) techniques. Zenker’s Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (Z-POEM) has recently emerged as a minimally invasive alternative demonstrating promising efficacy and safety. This narrative review aims to synthesize current evidence regarding the technical evolution of Z-POEM, its indications, procedural nuances, long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and future directions. A structured narrative review was conducted in accordance with SANRA guidelines to assess the technical modifications, clinical outcomes, and complications of Zenker’s Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (Z-POEM). Relevant literature published between January 2016 and September 2025 was systematically searched across PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE, supplemented by manual citation tracing. Eligible studies included clinical trials, cohorts, observational reports, and technical notes focusing on Z-POEM or its variants. Data extraction and synthesis were performed independently by two reviewers, with findings organized into thematic domains comprising procedural techniques, efficacy, safety, adverse events, recurrence, and follow-up. Proper patient selection is critical for technical success. Factors such as diverticulum size, symptom severity, and anatomical features guide the optimal technique. Long-term studies report sustained clinical success exceeding 85% over 30‒40 months. Repeat Z-POEM procedures have shown high efficacy in managing recurrence. Comparative data indicate Z-POEM achieves superior clinical outcomes compared with flexible endoscopic septotomy, with comparable safety and procedure times. Z-POEM demonstrates high safety and efficacy, though long-term durability may favor Z-POEM in larger or fibrotic diverticula. Further research should focus on cost-effectiveness, technique standardization, and long-term comparative outcomes to refine patient selection criteria and consolidate Z-POEM as a first-line therapy for ZD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fernandes et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91de0d6127c7a504c11ffhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinsp.2026.100897
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Management Strategies for Zenker’s Diverticulum: A Comprehensive Review2025 · 9 citations
  2. 2Perspective on Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia: Zhongshan Experience2015 · 53 citations
  3. 3Zenker Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Is Safe and Effective for the Management of Pharyngeal Pouch: A Multicentre Retrospective Cohort Study2025 · 2 citations
  4. 4Safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection2015 · 21 citations
  5. 5What are the factors for detecting adverse events in second‐look endoscopy after per‐oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)? A reply to “Second‐look endoscopy after POEM for all, some or none… More you see, the more you find!”2020 · 4 citations