PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026BMC Oral Health0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluating condylar distraction potential: a comparison between patients with unilateral disc displacement without reduction and asymptomatic volunteers

CTCeren Funda TamerSSSina SaygılıSDSüleyman Çağatay Dayan

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate and compare condylar distraction potential in patients with unilateral disc displacement without reduction and asymptomatic individuals.
  • Compared joint space dimensions of 34 patients with unilateral disc displacement and 11 asymptomatic volunteers.
  • Used dynamic jaw tracking with the Zebris JMA 3D ultrasonic jaw tracking system.
  • Measured condylar distraction with the Electronic Position Analysis (EPA) module and performed MRI scans.
  • Conducted statistical comparisons using parametric and non-parametric tests.
  • Patients with unilateral disc displacement showed significantly reduced condylar distraction potential on the affected side compared to controls (p < 0.05).
  • MRI analysis indicated narrower anterior joint space and limited increase in superior joint space in the DDwoR group.
  • No significant differences on the non-affected side compared to the control group.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the condylar distraction potential and joint space dimensions between patients with unilateral disc displacement without reduction (DDwoR) and asymptomatic individuals, using dynamic jaw tracking and MRI imaging. A total of 47 participants were included: 34 patients diagnosed with unilateral DDwoR and 11 asymptomatic volunteers. Dynamic mandibular movements were recorded using the Zebris JMA 3D ultrasonic jaw tracking system. The amount of condylar distraction was measured using the Electronic Position Analysis (EPA) module. Additionally, MRI scans were performed to assess joint space distances. Statistical comparisons were conducted using appropriate parametric and non-parametric tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. The findings provide insight into the differences in condylar distraction between patients with unilateral DDwoR and healthy volunteers. Patients with DDwoR showed significantly reduced condylar distraction potential an on the affected side compared to controls (p < 0.05). MRI analysis revealed a narrower anterior joint space and limited increase in superior joint space in the DDwoR group. No significant differences were found on the non-affected side compared to the control group. Patients with unilateral DDwoR demonstrate limited condylar distraction capacity and altered joint space dynamics compared to asymptomatic individuals. These findings highlight the mechanical constraints associated with disc displacement and emphasize the importance of functional and morphological evaluation in temporomandibular joint disorders.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tamer et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91e1fd6127c7a504c1d03https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-07953-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Occlusal pivots1956 · 46 citations
  2. 2Pivot appliances – is there a distractive effect on the temporomandibular joint?2006 · 21 citations
  3. 3Reconsideration of the bilaminar zone in the retrodiskal area of the temporomandibular joint1993 · 36 citations
  4. 4Jaw Exercises in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders—An International Modified Delphi Study2019 · 47 citations
  5. 5EMG response to alteration of tooth contacts on occlusal splints during maximal clenching1984 · 70 citations