Wrong content There was a mistake in table 3 as published. In the published article, there was a mistake in table 3. The unit shown in parentheses was displayed as "(×10+ km²)". The correct unit is "(×10 4 km²).". There was a mistake in figure 6 as published. In the published article, there was a mistake in figure 6. The inner sub-panels of this figure were arranged in the wrong order. The sequence has now been corrected. The corrected figure 6 appears below.The original version of this article has been updated.There was a mistake in the caption of table 3 as published. In the published article, there was a mistake in table 3. The unit shown in parentheses was displayed as "(×10 + km²)". The correct unit is "(×10 4 km²)". The corrected caption of table 3 appears below. TABLE 3. Suitable habitat areas for the three Trichosanthes species under different SSP scenarios (×10⁴ km²)The original version of this article has been updated.The figures were in the wrong order in the PDF/HTML version of this paper. In the published article, there was a mistake in Figures 9 and10. The two figures were presented in reverse order in the published version. Please swap Figure 9 and Figure 10 (the image sections).The correct presentation is that Figures 9 and 10 are displayed in their intended proper order. The order has now been corrected. The original version of this article has been updated.Reminder: Figures, tables, and images will be published under a Creative Commons CC-BY license and permission must be obtained for use of copyrighted material from other sources (including re-published/adapted/modified/partial figures and images from the internet). It is the responsibility of the authors to acquire the licenses, to follow any citation instructions requested by third-party rights holders, and cover any supplementary charges.for a reason not seen here, please contact the journal's editorial office.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.