PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 20260 citations

Superior outcomes of candesartan over topiramate in the treatment of migraine: A comparative cohort study.

View Full Paper
AOAnnemijn S J C OosterleeBABritt W H van der ArendNVNancy van Veelen

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare the tolerability and effectiveness of candesartan and topiramate in preventing migraines.
  • Conducted a longitudinal cohort study at the Leiden Headache Center.
  • Included patients using a validated E-headache diary.
  • Analyzed discontinuation rates and response rates over a 6-month follow-up using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression.
  • Applied propensity score adjustments for baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes.
  • Candesartan had a lower discontinuation rate (29.7%) compared to topiramate (67.3%).
  • Candesartan achieved a higher response rate of 47% compared to topiramate's 29%.
  • Candesartan resulted in a greater reduction in monthly headache days by an average of 1.1 days compared to topiramate.

Abstract

BackgroundCandesartan and topiramate are both recommended for migraine prevention, but direct comparative data remain limited.AimTo evaluate and compare the tolerability and effectiveness of candesartan versus topiramate for migraine prevention using systematically collected real-world data.MethodsThis longitudinal cohort study included patients treated at the Leiden Headache Center (LHC), with data collected using our validated E-headache diary. The 28 days preceding treatment initiation served as the baseline period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants that discontinued candesartan or topiramate within the 6-month follow-up. Secondary endpoints included ≥50%-response rate, change in monthly migraine days (MMD), headache days (MHD), acute medication days (MAMD), and HIT-6 from baseline to the last 28-day period with the highest achieved dosage of candesartan (ranging 4-32 mg daily) or topiramate (25-100 mg daily). Patients were assigned a propensity score based on baseline MHD, MMD, HADS, and number of failed preventive treatments. The primary analysis looked at discontinuation rates of candesartan and topiramate by using a Kaplan-Meier curve with Cox regression, adjusting for group differences by including the propensity score as a covariate. Secondary endpoint regressions were adjusted for propensity score and time to reach the highest dosage month. The primary and secondary outcomes were also investigated in a sensitivity analysis by applying optimal matching based on the propensity score.ResultsIn total 661 migraine participants were included. In the candesartan group less participants discontinued medication within 6-months follow-up compared to the topiramate group (29.7% versus 67.3%; HR 2.5 95% CI: 1.9-3.3, p < 0.001). Candesartan had higher ≥50% response rates than topiramate (47% versus 29%, OR 0.6 95% CI: 0.4-0.8, p = 0.004) and greater reduction in MHD (difference -1.1 days 95% CI: -2.2 to -0.01, p = 0.04). No differences were observed between treatments in reduction of MMD, MAMD, or HIT-6 scores after adjustment. These findings were confirmed in the sensitivity analysis using optimal matching.ConclusionsCandesartan demonstrates a favorable tolerability and effectiveness profile compared to topiramate. Therefore, (inter)national treatment guidelines for migraine prevention should be revised to spare patients from being prescribed medications that have a low tolerability profile, as demonstrated by this study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oosterlee et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa701a531e4c4a9ff59882https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024261426952
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper