PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026Science Advances0 citationsOpen Access

Refined chronologies of magnetochron M0r reveal asynchronous terrestrial and marine carbon isotope responses to Oceanic Anoxic Event 1a

View Full Paper
GLGui‐Mei LuZSZhen ShenCDCheng-Long Deng

Key Points

  • This research aims to clarify the timing of the carbon isotope response to OAE1a in both terrestrial and marine settings.
  • Conducted high-resolution cycle-calibrated magnetostratigraphic analyses.
  • Analyzed a continuous drill core from the Lower Cretaceous Jiufotang Formation.
  • Constrained the age of Chron M0r termination to 121.26 ± 0.38 Ma.
  • The carbon isotope excursion related to OAE1a occurred 1.24 ± 0.4 Myr after the termination of Chron M0r.
  • This temporal offset is significantly longer than the 0.3 to 0.66 Myr offset seen in marine records.
  • The findings challenge the hypothesis of rapid atmospheric CO2 emissions at the start of OAE1a.

Abstract

The base of magnetochron M0r has been informally used to calibrate the onset of Oceanic Anoxic Event 1a (OAE1a) and place the Barremian-Aptian boundary; however, its precise age remains a subject of debate. Here, we present a 1497.5-m continuous drill core from the Lower Cretaceous lacustrine Jiufotang Formation in North China. High-resolution cycle-calibrated magnetostratigraphic analyses precisely constrain the termination of Chron M0r to 121.26 ± 0.38 Ma. The carbon isotope excursion associated with OAE1a in the same core postdates the termination of Chron M0r by 1.24 ± 0.4 Myr, substantially longer than ~0.3 to 0.66 Myr offset observed in marine records. This refined chronology provides direct evidence for asynchronous carbon cycles between terrestrial and marine systems during OAE1a, thereby challenging the prevailing hypothesis of rapid atmospheric CO 2 emissions at the onset of OAE1a.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa701a531e4c4a9ff598b8https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aea8374
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Bayesian integration of astrochronology and radioisotope geochronology2024 · 11 citations
  2. 2The Decade of North American Geology 1983 Geologic Time Scale1983 · 525 citations
  3. 3Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic movements of the Italian Peninsula: Further paleomagnetic data from the Umbrian sequence1978 · 108 citations
  4. 4Destruction of the North China Craton in the Mesozoic2018 · 728 citations
  5. 5Revised onset age of magnetochron M0r: Chronostratigraphic and geologic implications2023 · 15 citations