PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026Merits2 citationsOpen Access

Generation Z Employees’ Acceptance and AI Use Intensity: A Moderated Mediation Model of Psychological Safety, Technostress, and Trust

View Full Paper
CȚClaudia-Elena ȚucleaLPLuciana-Floriana Poenaru

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore the drivers of AI acceptance and usage intensity among Generation Z employees, focusing on psychological and organizational factors.
  • Conducted an online survey with 272 Romanian Generation Z participants with work experience.
  • Analyzed data using PLS-SEM with a moderated mediation model.
  • Integrated the Technology Acceptance Model with organizational and psychosocial variables.
  • Perceived usefulness was identified as the strongest driver of AI acceptance and usage intensity.
  • Organizational AI readiness positively influenced perceived usefulness and psychological safety.
  • Trust partially mediated the relationship between perceived usefulness and intention to use AI.
  • Technostress negatively impacted attitudes towards AI and weakened the relationship between psychological safety and perceived ease of use.

Abstract

This study investigates the factors influencing employee acceptance and actual AI use intensity (frequency and routinization) by integrating the Technology Acceptance Model with organizational and psychosocial variables. Data were collected via an online survey of Romanian Generation Z participants with work experience (N = 272) between 10 May and 25 May 2025, and analyzed using PLS-SEM with a moderated mediation model. Perceived usefulness emerged as the strongest driver of attitude, intention, and AI use intensity. Organizational AI readiness increased perceived usefulness and was positively associated with psychological safety. Trust influenced both intention and AI use intensity and partially mediated the relationship between perceived usefulness and intention. Technostress was negatively associated with attitudes and weakened the positive relationship between psychological safety and perceived ease of use. By shifting the focus from intention to AI use intensity, the study refines acceptance theory for AI-enabled work and clarifies how organizational context, trust, and digital strain shape sustained and routinized AI use in daily work. Practically, the findings suggest that organizations should communicate AI value and task fit, foster psychologically safe learning climates, build trust through transparency and guidance, and actively mitigate technostress through training, workload design, and clear expectations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Țuclea et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa7048531e4c4a9ff59d9fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/merits6010007
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper