PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026Vaccines0 citationsOpen Access

Effect of HPV Adult Vaccination on Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone Levels: Paired Measurements in a Retrospective Cohort

View Full Paper
AGAli Can GüneşHacettepe UniversityMAMuhammed Onur AtakulHacettepe UniversityUAUtku AkgorHacettepe University

Key Points

  • To assess the impact of HPV vaccination on serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and ovarian reserve in women aged 18-45.
  • Retrospective cohort design comparing vaccinated women with unvaccinated controls.
  • Measurements of AMH levels taken before and after vaccination in the HPV group.
  • Linear mixed-effects model used to analyze AMH changes while controlling for confounding variables.
  • Vaccinated women showed a smaller median decline in AMH (-0.13 ng/mL) compared to controls (-0.27 ng/mL; p = 0.015).
  • Adjusted model estimated a -27.6% annual decline in controls, while vaccinated women had an implied change of -14.2% per year.
  • Findings suggest that HPV vaccination does not significantly impair ovarian reserve in the short term.

Abstract

Background: Concerns that human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination may adversely affect ovarian reserve contribute to vaccine hesitancy, yet longitudinal data with paired anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) measurements are limited. We evaluated whether HPV vaccination was associated with short-term changes in AMH compared with an unvaccinated control group. Methods: In this retrospective cohort, women aged 18–45 years who completed a three-dose 9-valent HPV vaccination (Gardasil 9®, Merck Sharp p = 0.015; median percent change −10.9% vs. −20.6%; p = 0.006). In the adjusted mixed-effects model, controls showed an estimated AMH decline of −27.6% per year (95% CI −35.5% to −18.7%; p < 0.001). The time×group interaction was positive (β = 0.170, 95% CI 0.027 to 0.312; p = 0.020), corresponding to a slope ratio of 1.185 (95% CI 1.02–1.366) and an implied annual change of −14.2% per year (95% CI −21.0% to −6.7%) in vaccinated women. Results were broadly consistent in follow-up-restricted sensitivity analyses; however, in the baseline AMH 1.0–5.0 ng/mL restricted cohort (vaccinated n = 82, control n = 67), the interaction was attenuated and not statistically significant (β = 0.082, p = 0.237). Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort with paired AMH measurements, HPV vaccination was not associated with evidence of clinically meaningful short-term impairment in ovarian reserve as assessed by AMH. Observed differences in AMH alterations were modest and should be interpreted cautiously, given residual confounding, measurement variability, and reduced precision in restricted-cohort analyses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Güneş et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa7048531e4c4a9ff59f1fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14030233
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effect of the HPV vaccination programme on incidence of cervical cancer and grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by socioeconomic deprivation in England: population based observational study2024 · 100 citations
  2. 2Comparability of antimüllerian hormone levels among commercially available immunoassays2014 · 69 citations
  3. 3Premature ovarian failure 3 years after menarche in a 16-year-old girl following human papillomavirus vaccination2012 · 50 citations
  4. 4Anti-Müllerian hormone beyond an ovarian reserve marker: the relationship with the physiology and pathology in the life-long follicle development2023 · 48 citations
  5. 5Providers’ Perceptions of Parental Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Hesitancy: Cross-Sectional Study2019 · 38 citations