PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026Operative Neurosurgery0 citations

Muscle Versus Teflon as Interposition Grafts in Microvascular Decompression for Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: Institutional Series, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper
GCGiuseppe CorazzelliSCSergio CorvinoACAlessandro Carretta

Key Points

  • This study compares clinical outcomes between Teflon and autologous muscle grafts in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia.
  • Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent MVD with muscle grafts.
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies on MVD using Teflon or muscle.
  • Kaplan-Meier survival curves analyzed recurrence-free survival.
  • Two-way ANOVA compared preoperative and postoperative Barrow Neurological Institute score changes.
  • Muscle graft showed a significantly lower risk of pain recurrence than Teflon (odds ratio = 1.550).
  • Recurrence occurred earlier with muscle (mean: 1.55 years) than with Teflon (mean: 2.62 years).
  • No significant difference in postoperative pain outcomes between groups (F = 0.22).

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Microvascular decompression (MVD) is considered the gold standard surgical treatment for drug-resistant trigeminal neuralgia (TN), providing sustained pain relief. Teflon is the most widely adopted interposing material but may be associated with specific complications requiring revision surgery. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between Teflon and autologous muscle grafts as interposing materials in MVD, integrating evidence from an institutional series and current literature. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on an institutional cohort of patients with primary TN who underwent MVD using autologous muscle grafts between May 2010 and January 2023. In parallel, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, identifying studies that reported recurrence rates and complications after MVD with either Teflon or muscle as interposing materials. Only studies with explicit eligibility criteria and extractable outcome data were included for secondary analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves analyzed recurrence-free survival and 2-way analysis of variance compared preoperative and postoperative Barrow Neurological Institute score changes where patient-level or retrievable data were available. RESULTS: The analysis included 123 patients from our institutional cohort and 13 288 patients from 69 eligible studies, totaling 13 411 patients who underwent MVD between 1980 and 2023 (38 case series, 7 prospective cohorts, 1 case-control, and 23 retrospective cohorts). Among these, 11 711 received Teflon and 1577 received muscle grafts as interposing material. Muscle graft was associated with a significantly lower risk of pain recurrence compared with Teflon (odds ratio = 1.550, 95% CI: 1.209-1.987, P < .01), although recurrence occurred earlier with muscle (mean: 1.55 years) than with Teflon (mean: 2.62 years; hazard ratio = 3.786, 95% CI: 2.414-5.937, P < .01). No significant difference was observed between groups regarding postoperative pain outcomes (F = 0.22, P = .67). CONCLUSION: Autologous muscle graft is a valid alternative to Teflon as an interposing material in MVD for TN, offering similar immediate pain relief and a lower risk of recurrence, despite a shorter time to recurrence.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Corazzelli et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa7077531e4c4a9ff5a3afhttps://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001850
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper