PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Citizenship and Service: From Roman Auxiliaries to U.S. Military Naturalization Programs

CAChristian Nana Andoh

Key Points

  • The article aims to compare how military service has historically influenced citizenship in Rome and the United States.
  • Historical comparison of citizenship processes in ancient Rome and modern U.S.
  • Analysis of the legal frameworks governing military service and citizenship
  • Examination of the socio-political contexts influencing these processes
  • Ancient Rome's predictable system facilitated better integration of non-citizen soldiers.
  • The U.S. system is more fragmented, leading to inconsistencies in citizenship access via military service.
  • Military service fosters citizenship effectively when linked to standardized legal recognition.

Abstract

This article compares ancient Rome and the United States to show that military service has not always been a way for everyone to become a citizen. In Rome, non-citizen auxiliary soldiers were integrated via a standardised legal agreement that conferred citizenship upon honourable discharge, formalised by the diploma militaris. This predictable system met the needs of the population and made it easier for provinces to slowly come together. The United States created a more flexible and episodic system in which military service by immigrants has sometimes sped up the process of becoming a citizen, from the Revolutionary War to the time after 9/11, often because there were not enough soldiers. The American system has been legally broken up and made harder to work with by immigration policy and the all-volunteer force, unlike Rome’s institutionalised approach. The article demonstrates that military service fosters integration most effectively when it is consistently transformed into legal recognition, emphasising the integrative efficacy of standardisation in Rome and the precariousness of service-based inclusion in the United States, all within the context of broader theories of empire, citizenship, and state capacity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Christian Nana Andoh (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa70d6531e4c4a9ff5af4chttps://doi.org/10.60630/deimos.2026.1.115223
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper