PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026Surgical Endoscopy0 citationsOpen Access

Cost-effectiveness of Paravertebral versus EPidural analgesia in Minimally invasive Esophageal resectioN (PEPMEN): an economic evaluation alongside a randomized clinical trial

CKCezanne D. KooijKOKirsten OpmeerMFMinke L. Feenstra

Key Points

  • To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of paravertebral analgesia compared to epidural analgesia in minimally invasive esophagectomy.
  • Conducted as a multicenter randomized controlled trial across four Dutch hospitals
  • Included 192 patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy
  • Compared in-hospital costs and effectiveness using Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) scores
  • Utilized bootstrapping for estimating uncertainty
  • Initial surgery costs were €10,469 for epidural and €10,051 for paravertebral analgesia.
  • Postoperative medication costs averaged €116 for epidural and €125 for paravertebral analgesia.
  • Total in-hospital costs for uncomplicated cases were €8557 (epidural) and €8646 (paravertebral).
  • For complicated cases, costs were €28,244 (epidural) and €28,387 (paravertebral).
  • Bootstrapping showed 47.9% of iterations had lower costs with lower effectiveness for paravertebral analgesia.

Abstract

Abstract Background Epidural analgesia has been the gold standard for pain management in minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), with paravertebral analgesia as a safe alternative. This cost-effectiveness analysis, conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial, evaluates the cost-effectiveness of paravertebral analgesia compared to epidural analgesia. Methods This multicenter randomized controlled trial across four Dutch hospitals, including 192 patients, compared epidural and paravertebral analgesia in patients undergoing MIE. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated from a healthcare perspective, including in-hospital costs only, with time horizons from initial hospital stay and 90 days postoperatively. Procedural costs were calculated with a bottom-up approach, and analgesia costs with data from the electronic case report form (eCRF). Other hospital costs were calculated using insurance claim data from hospital registries. Effectiveness was displayed as Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) scores. Bootstrapping was used to estimate uncertainty. Results Mean initial surgery costs were €10,469 for the epidural and €10,051 for the paravertebral group, primarily due to a shorter mean operating room time (mean difference 19 min; 95% CI − 7 to 45). Mean postoperative (day 1–3) medication costs were €116 and €125, respectively. During the initial hospital stay, mean total in-hospital costs for uncomplicated patients were €8557 and €8646, and for complicated patients €28,244 and €28,387, respectively. When excluding complications, bootstrapping showed that 47.9% of iterations had lower costs and lower effectiveness for paravertebral analgesia, with the other iterations across all other quadrants. Conclusions Cost differences between paravertebral and epidural analgesia were minimal, with cost-effectiveness primarily influenced by the slightly lower effectiveness of paravertebral analgesia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kooij et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa710d531e4c4a9ff5b580https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-12642-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Paravertebral Versus EPidural Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Esophageal ResectioN (PEPMEN)2024 · 10 citations
  2. 2Postoperative pain management after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis2017 · 60 citations
  3. 3Failed epidural: causes and management2012 · 422 citations
  4. 4Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)2011 · 10,282 citations
  5. 5Conducting Trial-Based Economic Evaluations Using R: A Tutorial2023 · 45 citations