PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 7, 2026Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence2 citationsOpen Access

Pedagogy first, technology second: Cross-level relationships between teacher professional knowledge and student learning in artificial intelligence (AI) education

View Full Paper
WSWeipeng ShenChinese University of Hong KongCCChing-Sing CHAIChinese Academy of SciencesTCThomas K.F. ChiuChinese University of Hong Kong

Key Points

  • The study aims to understand the effects of teacher professional knowledge on student learning outcomes in AI education.
  • Utilized social cognitive theory to frame instructional practices
  • Conducted multilevel structural equation modeling analysis
  • Analyzed data from 46 secondary school teachers and 2832 students
  • TAIK alone had limited positive effects and could hinder SAISG without TPAIK
  • TPAIK significantly promoted SAISG and SBIAI, emphasizing its priority in teaching
  • Neither TAIK nor TPAIK showed direct connections to SAIK

Abstract

For current K-12 AI education, understanding how teacher professional knowledge influences student learning is essential. This study employed social cognitive theory to conceptualize teachers’ instructional practice and conducted a multilevel structural equation model analysis to examine the cross-level effects of teacher AI knowledge (TAIK) and pedagogical AI knowledge (TPAIK) on student AI knowledge (SAIK), perceptions of AI for social good (SAISG), and behavioral intention to learn AI (SBIAI). Data from 46 secondary school teachers and 2832 students revealed intricate mechanisms. TAIK alone was insufficient and could slightly diminish SAISG without TPAIK. Instead, TPAIK played a fundamental role in fostering SAISG and SBIAI. Neither TAIK nor TPAIK was directly associated with SAIK. Our findings distinguished the roles of TAIK and TPAIK, which demonstrated the “Pedagogy first, technology second” guideline: TPAIK should be prioritized over TAIK for teachers’ and students’ excellence in K-12 AI education.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69abc0de5af8044f7a4e991ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100564
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The interplay between teachers’ trust in artificial intelligence and digital competence2024 · 10 citations
  2. 2AI SELF-EFFICACY AND TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE (TPACK) SYNERGY OF TEACHERS IN USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IN TEACHING2026
  3. 3Artificial Intelligence Integration in Social Studies Education: A TPACK-based Analysis of Teachers' Awareness and a Proposed Link to Technology Acceptance2026
  4. 4From TPACK to intelligent-TPACK: a conceptual framework for advancing ethical and AI-integrated pedagogy in higher education2026
  5. 5Longitudinal relationships between student ethical considerations, behavioral intention, and perceived knowledge in artificial intelligence education2026 · 1 citations