PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 7, 2026Behavioral Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Promoting Holistic Student Development Through Universal School-Based Social-Emotional Learning in China: A Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper
ZLZhou LinCHChunhan HuangJSJieping Shi

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze the effectiveness of universal school-based social-emotional learning (SEL) interventions in China.
  • Conducted a meta-analysis of 52 studies involving 13,969 students
  • Focused on SEL interventions in the PreK-12 educational context
  • Examined effect sizes across multiple domains of student development
  • Performed moderator analyses to identify significant influencing factors
  • Overall effect size of school-based SEL programs was medium (ES = 0.56)
  • Strongest effects observed in social-emotional skills (ES = 0.63)
  • Support noticed in academic performance (ES = 0.34), behaviors (ES = 0.31), and affect and attitudes (ES = 0.24)
  • Sample size, intervention dosage, implementer, and grade level influenced effect sizes significantly

Abstract

Social-emotional learning (SEL) is a crucial pathway for cultivating students’ social-emotional skills and promoting their holistic development. This study presents the first meta-analysis of universal school-based SEL interventions implemented in the PreK-12 educational context of mainland China. Based on 52 studies involving 13,969 students, the analysis reveals a significant, medium overall effect (ES = 0.56), demonstrating the positive impact of school-based SEL programs on Chinese students’ development. However, given that the majority of included studies employed quasi-experimental designs with relatively small sample sizes, this effect should be interpreted as primarily reflecting efficacy under controlled conditions rather than effectiveness in real-world implementation contexts. Outcomes vary by domain, with the strongest effects observed in social-emotional skills (ES = 0.63), followed by academic performance (ES = 0.34), behaviors (ES = 0.31), and affect and attitudes (ES = 0.24). Moderator analyses further reveal that sample size, intervention dosage, implementer, and grade level significantly influenced effect sizes, whereas publication type, duration, source of outcome data, and intervention approach did not. Cross-cultural comparisons further contextualize these findings within the international SEL literature. By establishing an initial evidence base, this review highlights the promise of school-based SEL in China, while also noting limitations in external and ecological validity. Future research should prioritize more large-scale RCTs, focus on the quality of implementation, and address the needs of marginalized student groups.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69abc2615af8044f7a4ebe98https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16030368
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper