PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Methodological Evaluation of Manufacturing Plants Systems in Ghana using Difference-in-Differences Approach for Yield Improvement Analysis

View Full Paper
YAYaw AsanteKAKofi AdzorgbohEAEsi Attafoiwa

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of manufacturing systems in Ghana through yield improvement analysis.
  • Utilized a Difference-in-Differences approach to analyze pre- and post-intervention yield data.
  • Employed robust standard errors and likelihood inference for validity.
  • Focused on selected manufacturing plants including the metallurgy sector.
  • Achieved an approximate 15% increase in yield across all participating plants.
  • Notable yield improvements observed specifically in the metallurgy sector.
  • Demonstrated effectiveness of the DiD model in quantifying yield improvement.

Abstract

The manufacturing sector in Ghana is crucial for economic growth but faces challenges related to efficiency and yield. A Difference-in-Differences approach will be employed to analyse pre- and post-intervention yield data from selected manufacturing plants. The DiD model will control for potential confounding factors using robust standard errors and likelihood inference to ensure the validity of the results. An initial analysis revealed a significant increase in yield by approximately 15% across all participating plants, with notable improvements observed in the metallurgy sector. The DiD model demonstrated its effectiveness in quantifying yield improvement and provided robust evidence for systemic adjustments to enhance manufacturing efficiency. Manufacturing companies should adopt a structured monitoring system based on the findings and continue evaluating their systems using similar statistical models for continuous improvement. Difference-in-Differences, Manufacturing Efficiency, Yield Improvement, DiD Model The maintenance outcome was modelled as Y₈ₓ=₀+₁X₈ₓ+uᵢ+₈ₓ, with robustness checked using heteroskedasticity-consistent errors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Asante et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69acc57d32b0ef16a404faa3https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18894669
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper