• Hydrogen fuel cell trains are assessed on regional rail lines. • Hydrogen and diesel trains are compared to rail electrification. • Hydrogen trains operation costs 5.14 million euros/year, lower than electrified lines. • Hydrogen trains cut 6,142 t CO 2 /year, while electrification cuts 7,160 t CO 2 /year. • Hydrogen trains offer strong economic and environmental benefits on low-demand routes. Meeting the European Union’s decarbonization targets requires a rapid transition of railways to low-emission propulsion, particularly on non-electrified lines where diesel traction remains prevalent. This study investigates green hydrogen fuel cell trains (H 2 -FCTs) as an alternative to direct electrification and conventional diesel for regional passenger rail in Portugal. Their feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and environmental performance are evaluated across four representative railways, considering green hydrogen production and refueling, as well as operational parameters such as route length and service frequency. The techno-economic assessment shows annual operational costs of 5.14 M€ (0.091 €/passenger-km) for the H 2 -FCT scenario, compared with 18.12 M€ (0.32 €/passenger-km) for the fully electrified lines. From an environmental perspective, the life cycle analysis demonstrates that both scenarios achieve substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions relative to diesel operation, with the H 2 -FCT scenario avoiding 6,142 t CO 2 annually (0.109 kg CO 2 per passenger-km), while electrification achieves a further reduction of 7,160 t CO 2 per year. Although both electrification and hydrogen propulsion represent viable decarbonization pathways, hydrogen fuel cell trains demonstrate greater combined economic and environmental advantages, particularly on low-demand regional lines. These findings underscore the strategic role of green hydrogen in advancing sustainable rail transport and guiding policy toward carbon–neutral mobility.
Ajeeb et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: