PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 2026Current Opinion in Gastroenterology0 citations

Precision medicine in steatotic liver disease

View Full Paper
VPVitchapong PrasitsumritVCVincent L. Chen

Key Points

  • The review aims to summarize advancements in understanding the genetic and metabolic factors influencing steatotic liver disease.
  • Reviewed recent findings on genetic variants linked to steatosis and advanced liver disease.
  • Examined alterations in metabolites associated with MASLD and ALD.
  • Analyzed existing predictive models that incorporate biomarkers from genomics and metabolomics.
  • Identified common genetic variants associated with hepatic steatosis and advanced liver conditions.
  • Markedly different associations for genes like PNPLA3 and GCKR in terms of disease progression.
  • Observed metabolic changes indicating insulin resistance and altered lipid metabolism in liver diseases.

Abstract

Purpose of review Discuss advances in genomics, metabolomics, and proteomics in steatotic liver disease. Recent findings Common genetic variants in genes including PNPLA3 , TM6SF2 , and HSD17B13 are associated with risk of hepatic steatosis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. In contrast, variants in other genes such as GCKR are strongly associated with steatosis but much more weakly associated with advanced liver disease. The cirrhosis-associated variants typically drive steatosis through reduction of lipid export from the liver, potentially highlighting this mechanism as a driver of fibrosis though not ruling out alternative pathways. Alterations in amino acids, lipids, bile acids, and other metabolites have been observed in both MASLD and ALD reflecting insulin resistance, altered bile acid metabolism, and increased fatty acid flux and de novo lipogenesis (for MASLD) or mitochondrial dysfunction (for ALD). Also seen are characteristic changes in serum/plasma protein levels reflecting fibrosis, systemic inflammation, and hepatic synthetic function are also seen with MASLD and ALD. Predictive models incorporating genomics, metabolomic, and proteomic biomarkers may improve upon existing clinical models, but nearly all studies on this topic have been retrospective or post hoc. Summary Genomics, metabolomics, proteomics, and multiomics may improve our understanding of disease pathophysiology. They may also have implications for clinical care, but further prospective studies are required to establish whether they provide sufficient benefit over clinical biomarkers to be routinely used.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Prasitsumrit et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada8a1bc08abd80d5bbb90https://doi.org/10.1097/mog.0000000000001165
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Differing genetic variants associated with liver fat and their contrasting relationships with cardiovascular diseases and cancer2024 · 61 citations
  2. 2Branched-chain amino acids in metabolic signalling and insulin resistance2014 · 1,460 citations
  3. 3Farnesoid X nuclear receptor ligand obeticholic acid for non-cirrhotic, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (FLINT): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial2014 · 2,213 citations
  4. 4Relationship between resolution of non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis and changes in lipoprotein sub‐fractions: a post‐hoc analysis of the PIVENS trial2019 · 26 citations
  5. 5Sources of fatty acids stored in liver and secreted via lipoproteins in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease2005 · 3,497 citations